Why not private bailouts?

Changli Zhou, Zhigang Cao, Xinglong Qu, Xiaoguang Yang
{"title":"Why not private bailouts?","authors":"Changli Zhou, Zhigang Cao, Xinglong Qu, Xiaoguang Yang","doi":"10.1109/CHICC.2015.7261004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During financial crises, comparing with numerous governmental bailouts, private bailouts from the falling's stakeholders are extremely rare. We provide a network game model to explain this phenomenon. We model the risk appetites of companies in a cross-holding financial network through a failure-threshold game. The game possesses multiple equilibria. In each equilibrium, companies have incentive to exhaust the implicit guarantee from their shareholders. As a result, there is little room for bailouts when a surprise shock hits the network and the system becomes extremely fragile. We also study the cross-holding's non-monotonic effects on the intensity of the moral-hazard problem.","PeriodicalId":421276,"journal":{"name":"2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CHICC.2015.7261004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During financial crises, comparing with numerous governmental bailouts, private bailouts from the falling's stakeholders are extremely rare. We provide a network game model to explain this phenomenon. We model the risk appetites of companies in a cross-holding financial network through a failure-threshold game. The game possesses multiple equilibria. In each equilibrium, companies have incentive to exhaust the implicit guarantee from their shareholders. As a result, there is little room for bailouts when a surprise shock hits the network and the system becomes extremely fragile. We also study the cross-holding's non-monotonic effects on the intensity of the moral-hazard problem.
为什么不是私人救助?
在金融危机期间,与大量的政府救助相比,来自投资者的私人救助极为罕见。我们提出了一个网络博弈模型来解释这一现象。我们通过一个失败阈值博弈来模拟交叉控股金融网络中公司的风险偏好。这个博弈具有多重均衡。在每一种均衡中,公司都有用尽股东隐性担保的动机。因此,当网络受到意外冲击、系统变得极其脆弱时,几乎没有纾困的余地。我们还研究了交叉持有对道德风险问题强度的非单调效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信