Provenance logic: Enabling multi-event based trust in mobile sensing

Xinlei Wang, Hao Fu, Chao Xu, P. Mohapatra
{"title":"Provenance logic: Enabling multi-event based trust in mobile sensing","authors":"Xinlei Wang, Hao Fu, Chao Xu, P. Mohapatra","doi":"10.1109/PCCC.2014.7017107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proliferation of sensor-embedded mobile computing devices, mobile sensing is becoming a popular paradigm to collect information from participating mobile users. Unlike the well-calibrated and well-tested sensor networks, mobile sensing relies on participants with unknown reliability. Data collected from mobile users may be untrustworthy. There are various solutions proposed in the literature for assessing the trustworthiness of the sensing data that describe an individual event or observation. In addition to single-event based trust models, we propose the concept of Provenance Logic, to reason about the logical relations between multiple events by jointly recognizing and linking events from successive sensing observations. We propose an approach that combines logical reasoning and statistical learning techniques. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt for trust evaluation based on the logical relation among multiple events in the mobile sensing context. We motivate and illustrate our approach with a use case of traffic monitoring mobile sensing. Performance validation has shown that improved trust assessment can be achieved efficiently and effectively on top of single-event based analysis.","PeriodicalId":105442,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 33rd International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 33rd International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.2014.7017107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

With the proliferation of sensor-embedded mobile computing devices, mobile sensing is becoming a popular paradigm to collect information from participating mobile users. Unlike the well-calibrated and well-tested sensor networks, mobile sensing relies on participants with unknown reliability. Data collected from mobile users may be untrustworthy. There are various solutions proposed in the literature for assessing the trustworthiness of the sensing data that describe an individual event or observation. In addition to single-event based trust models, we propose the concept of Provenance Logic, to reason about the logical relations between multiple events by jointly recognizing and linking events from successive sensing observations. We propose an approach that combines logical reasoning and statistical learning techniques. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt for trust evaluation based on the logical relation among multiple events in the mobile sensing context. We motivate and illustrate our approach with a use case of traffic monitoring mobile sensing. Performance validation has shown that improved trust assessment can be achieved efficiently and effectively on top of single-event based analysis.
来源逻辑:在移动传感中启用基于多事件的信任
随着嵌入式传感器移动计算设备的普及,移动传感正在成为一种从参与移动用户收集信息的流行范式。与经过良好校准和测试的传感器网络不同,移动传感依赖于可靠性未知的参与者。从移动用户收集的数据可能不可信。文献中提出了各种解决方案,用于评估描述单个事件或观察的传感数据的可信度。除了基于单事件的信任模型外,我们还提出了出处逻辑的概念,通过联合识别和连接来自连续感知观测的事件来推断多个事件之间的逻辑关系。我们提出了一种结合逻辑推理和统计学习技术的方法。据我们所知,我们的工作是第一次尝试基于移动感知环境中多个事件之间的逻辑关系进行信任评估。我们用交通监测移动传感的一个用例来激励和说明我们的方法。性能验证表明,改进的信任评估可以在单事件分析的基础上高效实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信