{"title":"Assessing the Nigerian Federal Government’s Financial Commitments to Its Education Rights Obligations","authors":"C. Onyimadu","doi":"10.4236/me.2020.112035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper provides insights on the (mis)match between the Federal Government’s \nAppropriations for education in relation to fulfilling its obligations towards \neducation rights. Using budgeted expenditure on education from 2016 to 2018, \nthe paper found that the Federal Government’s financial commitments have not \nshown progressive achievements in meeting up with its education obligations. \nAlso, in making use of available resources, priority has leaned towards non-Economic, Social and Cultural rights over education rights. The paper \nadvocated action plans for both the legislature and civil society that borders \non policy review pressure for equitable funding of all levels of education and \npossible litigation.","PeriodicalId":269992,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2020.112035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The paper provides insights on the (mis)match between the Federal Government’s
Appropriations for education in relation to fulfilling its obligations towards
education rights. Using budgeted expenditure on education from 2016 to 2018,
the paper found that the Federal Government’s financial commitments have not
shown progressive achievements in meeting up with its education obligations.
Also, in making use of available resources, priority has leaned towards non-Economic, Social and Cultural rights over education rights. The paper
advocated action plans for both the legislature and civil society that borders
on policy review pressure for equitable funding of all levels of education and
possible litigation.