mCoq

Kush Jain, Karl Palmskog, Ahmet Celik, E. J. G. Arias, Miloš Gligorić
{"title":"mCoq","authors":"Kush Jain, Karl Palmskog, Ahmet Celik, E. J. G. Arias, Miloš Gligorić","doi":"10.1145/3377812.3382156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software developed and verified using proof assistants, such as Coq, can provide trustworthiness beyond that of software developed using traditional programming languages and testing practices. However, guarantees from formal verification are only as good as the underlying definitions and specification properties. If properties are incomplete, flaws in definitions may not be captured during verification, which can lead to unexpected system behavior and failures. Mutation analysis is a general technique for evaluating specifications for adequacy and completeness, based on making small-scale changes to systems and observing the results. We demonstrate MCoq, the first mutation analysis tool for Coq projects. MCoq changes Coq definitions, with each change producing a modified project version, called a mutant, whose proofs are exhaustively checked. If checking succeeds, i.e., the mutant is live, this may indicate specification incompleteness. Since proof checking can take a long time, we optimized MCoq to perform incremental and parallel processing of mutants. By applying MCoq to popular Coq libraries, we found several instances of incomplete and missing specifications manifested as live mutants. We believe MCoq can be useful to proof engineers and researchers for analyzing software verification projects. The demo video for MCoq can be viewed at: https://youtu.be/QhigpfQ7dNo.","PeriodicalId":421517,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3377812.3382156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Software developed and verified using proof assistants, such as Coq, can provide trustworthiness beyond that of software developed using traditional programming languages and testing practices. However, guarantees from formal verification are only as good as the underlying definitions and specification properties. If properties are incomplete, flaws in definitions may not be captured during verification, which can lead to unexpected system behavior and failures. Mutation analysis is a general technique for evaluating specifications for adequacy and completeness, based on making small-scale changes to systems and observing the results. We demonstrate MCoq, the first mutation analysis tool for Coq projects. MCoq changes Coq definitions, with each change producing a modified project version, called a mutant, whose proofs are exhaustively checked. If checking succeeds, i.e., the mutant is live, this may indicate specification incompleteness. Since proof checking can take a long time, we optimized MCoq to perform incremental and parallel processing of mutants. By applying MCoq to popular Coq libraries, we found several instances of incomplete and missing specifications manifested as live mutants. We believe MCoq can be useful to proof engineers and researchers for analyzing software verification projects. The demo video for MCoq can be viewed at: https://youtu.be/QhigpfQ7dNo.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信