Suits on Games

T. Hurka
{"title":"Suits on Games","authors":"T. Hurka","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198798354.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter proposes that Suits be seen as analyzing a concept close to that expressed by the English word “game” but different and more useful, because it’s internally unified—its elements fit together—and explanatory, especially of the value of playing games. It slightly revises his account of the lusory attitude, so it involves accepting a game’s rules for the specific reason that they make it more challenging and difficult; this answers many objections to his analysis but requires adding a social dimension to it. And it slightly restricts his analysis by conceding that it doesn’t fit as many things called “games” as Suits himself thought. This doesn’t, however, detract from the value, beauty, and explanatory power of his analysis.","PeriodicalId":365556,"journal":{"name":"Games, Sports, and Play","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Games, Sports, and Play","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798354.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This chapter proposes that Suits be seen as analyzing a concept close to that expressed by the English word “game” but different and more useful, because it’s internally unified—its elements fit together—and explanatory, especially of the value of playing games. It slightly revises his account of the lusory attitude, so it involves accepting a game’s rules for the specific reason that they make it more challenging and difficult; this answers many objections to his analysis but requires adding a social dimension to it. And it slightly restricts his analysis by conceding that it doesn’t fit as many things called “games” as Suits himself thought. This doesn’t, however, detract from the value, beauty, and explanatory power of his analysis.
游戏中的套装
本章建议将《Suits》看作是对一个概念的分析,这个概念与英语单词“game”所表达的概念很接近,但不同且更有用,因为它内部是统一的——它的元素融合在一起——并具有解释性,特别是对于玩游戏的价值。它稍微修改了他对虚幻态度的描述,所以它涉及到接受游戏规则的特定原因,即它们使游戏更具挑战性和难度;这回答了对他的分析的许多反对意见,但需要添加一个社会维度。而且,它承认它不像金装自己认为的那样适合许多被称为“游戏”的东西,这稍微限制了他的分析。然而,这并没有减损他的分析的价值、美感和解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信