A comparative study of LBG and SOA codebooks concerning the computational complexity of the minimum distortion encoding for VQ

F. Madeiro, M. S. Vajapeyam, B. Neto
{"title":"A comparative study of LBG and SOA codebooks concerning the computational complexity of the minimum distortion encoding for VQ","authors":"F. Madeiro, M. S. Vajapeyam, B. Neto","doi":"10.1109/SBRN.2000.889754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Vector quantization (VQ),is a well-known compression technique which has been widely used in many speech and image coding systems. Techniques for codebook design attempt to produce a codebook that is optimum for a given source. To date, the most widely used technique for VQ codebook design is the LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray) algorithm. Madeim et al. (1999) show that an unsupervised neural network algorithm, referred to as SOA (self-organizing algorithm), provides good VQ codebooks, leading to reconstructed signals with better quality when compared to the ones obtained by using LBG codebooks. In this paper, an investigation is carried out to evaluate the \"inherent\" quality of SOA and LBG codebooks regarding the computational complexity of medium distortion encoding. The present work shows that the SOA codebooks overperforms the LBG codebooks in the sense that they yield a smaller average number of multiplications per sample for image VQ.","PeriodicalId":448461,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBRN.2000.889754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary form only given. Vector quantization (VQ),is a well-known compression technique which has been widely used in many speech and image coding systems. Techniques for codebook design attempt to produce a codebook that is optimum for a given source. To date, the most widely used technique for VQ codebook design is the LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray) algorithm. Madeim et al. (1999) show that an unsupervised neural network algorithm, referred to as SOA (self-organizing algorithm), provides good VQ codebooks, leading to reconstructed signals with better quality when compared to the ones obtained by using LBG codebooks. In this paper, an investigation is carried out to evaluate the "inherent" quality of SOA and LBG codebooks regarding the computational complexity of medium distortion encoding. The present work shows that the SOA codebooks overperforms the LBG codebooks in the sense that they yield a smaller average number of multiplications per sample for image VQ.
LBG和SOA码本对VQ最小失真编码计算复杂度的比较研究
只提供摘要形式。矢量量化(VQ)是一种众所周知的压缩技术,已广泛应用于许多语音和图像编码系统中。码本设计技术试图产生对给定源最优的码本。迄今为止,VQ码本设计中最广泛使用的技术是LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray)算法。Madeim et al.(1999)表明,一种被称为SOA(自组织算法)的无监督神经网络算法提供了良好的VQ码本,与使用LBG码本获得的信号相比,重构的信号质量更好。在本文中,进行了一项调查,以评估SOA和LBG码本在中等失真编码的计算复杂性方面的“固有”质量。目前的工作表明,SOA码本的性能优于LBG码本,因为它们对图像VQ产生的每个样本的平均乘法次数更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信