Tumor Budding in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Mariko Tanaka, Naoko Yamauchi, T. Ushiku, J. Shibahara, Akimasa Hayashi, Kento Misumi, Y. Yasunaga, Teppei Morikawa, T. Kokudo, J. Arita, Y. Sakamoto, K. Hasegawa, M. Fukayama
{"title":"Tumor Budding in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Mariko Tanaka, Naoko Yamauchi, T. Ushiku, J. Shibahara, Akimasa Hayashi, Kento Misumi, Y. Yasunaga, Teppei Morikawa, T. Kokudo, J. Arita, Y. Sakamoto, K. Hasegawa, M. Fukayama","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000001332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an extremely aggressive carcinoma. Useful predictors for the patients’ prognosis after surgery have not been fully established. From the University of Tokyo Hospital pathology archives, we reviewed 107 cases of ICC, 54 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 40 cases of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC); we also investigated the significance of tumor budding in ICC, in comparison with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and ECC. The tumor-budding frequencies were different by tumor location: 40.2% (43/107) in ICC, 70.4% (38/54) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 60.0% (24/40) in ECC. Tumor budding in ICC was associated with many pathologic indicators associated with invasion, such as major vascular invasion (P=0.012) and Union for International Cancer Control stage (P=0.007). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed tumor budding as a powerful prognostic factor for both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in ICC by univariate (RFS: hazard ratio [HR]: 2.666; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.517-4.683, OS: HR: 4.206; 95% CI: 2.447-7.230) and by multivariate analyses (RFS: HR: 3.038; 95% CI: 1.591-5.973, OS: HR: 4.547, 95% CI: 2.348-8.805). Tumor budding was also a significant prognostic factor of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, but not of ECC. When ICC was divided into 2 subtypes, type 1 (hilar) and type 2 (peripheral), tumor budding was the strong prognostic factor in type 2 ICC, but not in type 1 ICC, suggesting that some differences in biological behavior exist between type 1 ICC and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Tumor budding is prognostically important in ICC, and its pathogenetic role in biliary tract carcinomas might be different by anatomic location.","PeriodicalId":275221,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an extremely aggressive carcinoma. Useful predictors for the patients’ prognosis after surgery have not been fully established. From the University of Tokyo Hospital pathology archives, we reviewed 107 cases of ICC, 54 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 40 cases of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC); we also investigated the significance of tumor budding in ICC, in comparison with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and ECC. The tumor-budding frequencies were different by tumor location: 40.2% (43/107) in ICC, 70.4% (38/54) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 60.0% (24/40) in ECC. Tumor budding in ICC was associated with many pathologic indicators associated with invasion, such as major vascular invasion (P=0.012) and Union for International Cancer Control stage (P=0.007). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed tumor budding as a powerful prognostic factor for both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in ICC by univariate (RFS: hazard ratio [HR]: 2.666; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.517-4.683, OS: HR: 4.206; 95% CI: 2.447-7.230) and by multivariate analyses (RFS: HR: 3.038; 95% CI: 1.591-5.973, OS: HR: 4.547, 95% CI: 2.348-8.805). Tumor budding was also a significant prognostic factor of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, but not of ECC. When ICC was divided into 2 subtypes, type 1 (hilar) and type 2 (peripheral), tumor budding was the strong prognostic factor in type 2 ICC, but not in type 1 ICC, suggesting that some differences in biological behavior exist between type 1 ICC and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Tumor budding is prognostically important in ICC, and its pathogenetic role in biliary tract carcinomas might be different by anatomic location.
肝内胆管癌的肿瘤萌芽
补充数字内容可在文本中找到。肝内胆管癌(ICC)是一种极具侵袭性的肿瘤。手术后患者预后的有用预测因素尚未完全建立。从东京大学医院的病理档案中,我们回顾了107例ICC, 54例肝门周围胆管癌和40例肝外胆管癌(ECC);我们还研究了ICC中肿瘤出芽的意义,并与肝门周围胆管癌和ECC进行了比较。不同部位的肿瘤出芽频率不同:ICC为40.2%(43/107),门周胆管癌为70.4% (38/54),ECC为60.0%(24/40)。ICC中肿瘤出芽与许多与侵袭相关的病理指标相关,如大血管侵袭(P=0.012)、Union for International Cancer Control分期(P=0.007)。单因素和多因素Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤出芽是影响ICC患者无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的重要预后因素,单因素风险比[HR]: 2.666;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.517-4.683, OS: HR: 4.206;95% CI: 2.447-7.230)和多变量分析(RFS: HR: 3.038;95% ci: 1.591-5.973, os: hr: 4.547, 95% ci: 2.348-8.805)。肿瘤出芽也是肝门周围胆管癌的重要预后因素,而非肝门周围胆管癌的预后因素。当ICC被分为2种亚型,1型(肝门)和2型(外周)时,肿瘤出芽是2型ICC的重要预后因素,而1型ICC则不是,提示1型ICC与肝门周围胆管癌在生物学行为上存在一定差异。肿瘤出芽在胆道癌中具有重要的预后作用,其在胆道癌中的病理作用可能因解剖位置而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信