Attacks on Cultural Property

G. Solis
{"title":"Attacks on Cultural Property","authors":"G. Solis","doi":"10.1017/CBO9780511757839.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction We have discussed how law of armed conflict/international humanitarian law (LOAC/ IHL) consists, at least, of 1907 Hague Regulation IV, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the 1977 Additional Protocols, customary international law, case law, and multinational treaties. In fact, there are scores of treaties, conventions, declarations, compacts, and resolutions that bear on LOAC/IHL in one way or another. Six multinational treaties are particularly significant to LOAC/IHL: the 1925 Gas Protocol Prohibiting the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases; the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property; the 1971 Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production and Stockpiling of Biological and Toxin Weapons; the 1997 Ottawa Treaty Banning the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Land Mines; the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons; and the 1993 Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons. The 1976 Convention on Environmental Modification might reasonably be added to that list. Of these, the 1980 Conventional Weapons and 1993 Chemical Weapons Conventions, particularly, have potential impact on war fighters. Violations of either could lead to war crime charges against combatants in the field or, at the least, intensely negative international scrutiny. In this chapter, the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two protocols, also receive attention. It is essentially a treaty about targeting. Looting the enemy's cultural treasures and religious shrines has been a regular feature of aggressive and imperial war time out of mind; it was still so for the war-lords of Germany in the Second World War. Bombarders devoted to cracking enemy civilian morale may believe, almost certainly mistakenly, that wrecking his treasures and shrines is a good way to go about it. One of the first things the Germans did on seizing Warsaw at the end of September 1939 was to destroy the Poles’ most beloved national monument, the one to Chopin…. The Dresden climax of [British] Bomber Command's offensive has acquired its peculiarly bad reputation because, in addition to being of little military importance, it was uniquely destructive of cultural treasures.","PeriodicalId":161088,"journal":{"name":"The Law of Armed Conflict","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Law of Armed Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757839.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction We have discussed how law of armed conflict/international humanitarian law (LOAC/ IHL) consists, at least, of 1907 Hague Regulation IV, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the 1977 Additional Protocols, customary international law, case law, and multinational treaties. In fact, there are scores of treaties, conventions, declarations, compacts, and resolutions that bear on LOAC/IHL in one way or another. Six multinational treaties are particularly significant to LOAC/IHL: the 1925 Gas Protocol Prohibiting the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases; the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property; the 1971 Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production and Stockpiling of Biological and Toxin Weapons; the 1997 Ottawa Treaty Banning the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Land Mines; the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons; and the 1993 Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons. The 1976 Convention on Environmental Modification might reasonably be added to that list. Of these, the 1980 Conventional Weapons and 1993 Chemical Weapons Conventions, particularly, have potential impact on war fighters. Violations of either could lead to war crime charges against combatants in the field or, at the least, intensely negative international scrutiny. In this chapter, the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two protocols, also receive attention. It is essentially a treaty about targeting. Looting the enemy's cultural treasures and religious shrines has been a regular feature of aggressive and imperial war time out of mind; it was still so for the war-lords of Germany in the Second World War. Bombarders devoted to cracking enemy civilian morale may believe, almost certainly mistakenly, that wrecking his treasures and shrines is a good way to go about it. One of the first things the Germans did on seizing Warsaw at the end of September 1939 was to destroy the Poles’ most beloved national monument, the one to Chopin…. The Dresden climax of [British] Bomber Command's offensive has acquired its peculiarly bad reputation because, in addition to being of little military importance, it was uniquely destructive of cultural treasures.
对文化财产的攻击
我们已经讨论了武装冲突法/国际人道法(LOAC/ IHL)如何至少由1907年《海牙规则四》、1949年《日内瓦公约》、1977年《附加议定书》、习惯国际法、判例法和多国条约组成。事实上,有许多条约、公约、宣言、契约和决议以这样或那样的方式与《国际人道法》有关。六项多国条约对《国际法公约》/国际人道法具有特别重要的意义:1925年《禁止在战争中使用窒息性、有毒或其他气体议定书》;1954年《保护文化财产海牙公约》;1971年《禁止发展、生产和储存生物及毒素武器公约》;1997年《禁止使用、储存、生产和转让杀伤地雷渥太华条约》;1980年《某些常规武器公约》;以及1993年《禁止发展、生产、储存和使用化学武器公约》。1976年《改变环境公约》可以合理地列入这一清单。其中,1980年《常规武器公约》和1993年《化学武器公约》尤其对作战人员有潜在影响。违反任何一条都可能导致对战场上战斗人员的战争罪指控,或者至少导致强烈的负面国际审查。在本章中,1954年《关于发生武装冲突情况下保护文化财产的海牙公约》及其两项议定书也得到了注意。它本质上是一个关于目标的条约。掠夺敌人的文化宝藏和宗教圣地已经成为侵略和帝国战争的常规特征。第二次世界大战中德国的军阀也是如此。致力于打击敌方平民士气的轰炸者可能认为(几乎可以肯定是错误的),破坏他的宝藏和神殿是一个好办法。1939年9月底,德国人占领华沙后做的第一件事就是摧毁波兰人最心爱的国家纪念碑——肖邦纪念碑....[英国]轰炸机司令部进攻德累斯顿的高潮之所以名声特别坏,除了没有什么军事意义外,还特别破坏了文化瑰宝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信