{"title":"Vicarious calibration of MODIS using Railroad Valley Playa","authors":"K. Thome, N. Smith, K. Scott","doi":"10.1109/IGARSS.2001.976794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Remote Sensing Group at the University of Arizona has used ground-based test sites for the vicarious calibration of airborne and satellite-based sensors. Past work has focused on high-spatial-resolution sensors such as Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+). Application of these methods to the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with its lower spatial resolution poses a challenge for vicarious calibration. This work presents previous results using two vicarious techniques, the reflectance-based approach and cross-calibration to ETM+, at Railroad Valley Playa, Nevada. The modifications needed for the reflectance-based approach for application to MODIS are presented as is the method of cross-calibration to ETM+. This cross-calibration takes into account the changes in solar zenith angle due to the 40-minute separation in overpass times of the two sensors which view the test sites on the same day with the same view angle. A sensitivity study shows that these two vicarious calibration approaches, when applied to MODIS, should have uncertainty less than 5% for bands in the solar reflective not affected by atmospheric absorption. Results from these two methods agree with radiances reported by MODIS to better than 7% in the solar reflective for bands not affected by atmospheric absorption.","PeriodicalId":135740,"journal":{"name":"IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2001.976794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
Abstract
The Remote Sensing Group at the University of Arizona has used ground-based test sites for the vicarious calibration of airborne and satellite-based sensors. Past work has focused on high-spatial-resolution sensors such as Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+). Application of these methods to the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with its lower spatial resolution poses a challenge for vicarious calibration. This work presents previous results using two vicarious techniques, the reflectance-based approach and cross-calibration to ETM+, at Railroad Valley Playa, Nevada. The modifications needed for the reflectance-based approach for application to MODIS are presented as is the method of cross-calibration to ETM+. This cross-calibration takes into account the changes in solar zenith angle due to the 40-minute separation in overpass times of the two sensors which view the test sites on the same day with the same view angle. A sensitivity study shows that these two vicarious calibration approaches, when applied to MODIS, should have uncertainty less than 5% for bands in the solar reflective not affected by atmospheric absorption. Results from these two methods agree with radiances reported by MODIS to better than 7% in the solar reflective for bands not affected by atmospheric absorption.
亚利桑那大学的遥感小组利用地面试验场对机载和卫星传感器进行替代校准。过去的工作主要集中在高空间分辨率传感器上,如Landsat-7增强型专题绘图器Plus (ETM+)。将这些方法应用于空间分辨率较低的中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS),对替代定标提出了挑战。这项工作展示了以前使用两种替代技术的结果,基于反射率的方法和交叉校准ETM+,在内华达州的Railroad Valley Playa。提出了将基于反射率的方法应用于MODIS所需的修改,以及对ETM+的交叉校准方法。这种交叉校准考虑到由于两个传感器在同一天以相同的视角查看测试地点的立交桥时间间隔40分钟而导致的太阳天顶角变化。灵敏度研究表明,这两种替代校准方法应用于MODIS时,对于不受大气吸收影响的太阳反射波段,不确定度应小于5%。这两种方法的结果与MODIS报告的辐射度一致,在不受大气吸收影响的波段,太阳反射辐射度大于7%。