Invisibility, Inequality and the Dialectics of the Real in the Digital Age

Matteo Stocchetti
{"title":"Invisibility, Inequality and the Dialectics of the Real in the Digital Age","authors":"Matteo Stocchetti","doi":"10.31211/interacoes.n34.2018.a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the digital age, the practical possibility of engaging inequalities as political problems, that is, as problems related to the competition for the control over the distribution of values in society, is undermined by the digital invisibility of reality \nIn the current state of affairs, the digitalization of society reflects the influence of capitalist interpellation and brings about the invisibility of the real. The invisibility of the real through capitalist digitalization, in turn, conflates digitization and digitalization subordinating the latter to the former. Construed as a process inspired by technological rationality, capitalist digitalization undermines the possibility of mobilizing knowledge and legitimizing practices in support of the interpretation of invisibilities in relation to inequalities and injustice. \nIn line with the critical perspective of Andrew Feenberg and others, my approach is that the influence of capitalism in the digital age results from an epistemic appropriation of a technological development. This appropriation is the source of invisibilities that support inequalities and ultimately injustices that can and should be opposed. Leading on from this, my point is that opposition to this influence depends on the possibility of establishing alternative epistemic grounds and the formulation of alternative interpellations for the production of digital subjectivity. \nTo foster the normative agenda of critical theory, I discuss this possibility in terms of the ‘dialectics of the real’, the re-politicization of the social construction of reality in the digital age and the role of critical media literacy.","PeriodicalId":222431,"journal":{"name":"Interações: Sociedade e as novas modernidades","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interações: Sociedade e as novas modernidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.n34.2018.a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the digital age, the practical possibility of engaging inequalities as political problems, that is, as problems related to the competition for the control over the distribution of values in society, is undermined by the digital invisibility of reality In the current state of affairs, the digitalization of society reflects the influence of capitalist interpellation and brings about the invisibility of the real. The invisibility of the real through capitalist digitalization, in turn, conflates digitization and digitalization subordinating the latter to the former. Construed as a process inspired by technological rationality, capitalist digitalization undermines the possibility of mobilizing knowledge and legitimizing practices in support of the interpretation of invisibilities in relation to inequalities and injustice. In line with the critical perspective of Andrew Feenberg and others, my approach is that the influence of capitalism in the digital age results from an epistemic appropriation of a technological development. This appropriation is the source of invisibilities that support inequalities and ultimately injustices that can and should be opposed. Leading on from this, my point is that opposition to this influence depends on the possibility of establishing alternative epistemic grounds and the formulation of alternative interpellations for the production of digital subjectivity. To foster the normative agenda of critical theory, I discuss this possibility in terms of the ‘dialectics of the real’, the re-politicization of the social construction of reality in the digital age and the role of critical media literacy.
数字时代的不可见性、不平等与现实辩证法
在数字时代,将不平等作为政治问题,即与控制社会价值分配的竞争有关的问题的现实可能性,被现实的数字隐形性破坏了。在当前的情况下,社会的数字化反映了资本主义质询的影响,带来了现实的隐形性。资本主义数字化对现实的隐蔽性反过来又将数字化和使后者从属于前者的数字化混为一谈。资本主义数字化被解释为一种受技术理性启发的过程,破坏了动员知识和使实践合法化的可能性,这些知识和实践支持对与不平等和不公正有关的不可见性的解释。与安德鲁·芬伯格(Andrew Feenberg)等人的批判观点一致,我的方法是,资本主义在数字时代的影响源于对技术发展的认识论挪用。这种挪用是不可见性的根源,它支持不平等,最终导致可以而且应该反对的不公正。从这一点出发,我的观点是,对这种影响的反对取决于为数字主体性的生产建立替代认知基础和制定替代解释的可能性。为了促进批判理论的规范性议程,我从“现实的辩证法”、数字时代现实的社会建构的再政治化以及批判媒体素养的作用等方面讨论了这种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信