Outcome of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion without plating

Amanj Dizhwar Khalid, Raqib Seniar Teto
{"title":"Outcome of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion without plating","authors":"Amanj Dizhwar Khalid, Raqib Seniar Teto","doi":"10.56056/amj.2022.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: The safety and efficacy profile of stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages has been questioned in the management of patients with more than one cervical disc disease. In this article, we evaluated the idea of safety of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, without using a plate and the achieved pain relief. Methods: In this study, retrospectively we reviewed 30 patients diagnosed with multilevel cervical disc disease (total 69 segments) due to degenerative changes, disc herniation, and/or osteophyte formation. They complained of axial neck pain and/or radiculopathy not responding to non-surgical measures. All the included subjects treated for more than one-disc disease using stand-alone polyetheretherketone. With minimum 2-years of regular, clinical and radiological follow up. We have assessed the patient for criterions defined for cage subsidence and protrusion, as well as pain assessment pre and postoperatively using the visual analog score. Results: we assessed 22 patients (73.3%) for two level pathology and 8 patients (26.7%) with three level diseases. Mean age was 48.2±8.9 years. Female to male ratio was (1.1:1). The most common segment involved was C5-6 segment in 83.3%. The pre-operative visual Analogue Score for axial neck pain 6.3±3.05 and radiculopathy 6.8±2.2 was decreased post-operatively to 2±1.3 points respectively. Subsidence and protrusion assessed by measurement of serial X rays and one patient 3.3% developed subsidence in 2 adjacent levels which is statistically not significant. No incidence of cage protrusion was detected. Conclusions: Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating provide good fusion, low subsidence rate, stability provided by the cage with excellent pain improvement.","PeriodicalId":314832,"journal":{"name":"Advanced medical journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2022.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: The safety and efficacy profile of stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages has been questioned in the management of patients with more than one cervical disc disease. In this article, we evaluated the idea of safety of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, without using a plate and the achieved pain relief. Methods: In this study, retrospectively we reviewed 30 patients diagnosed with multilevel cervical disc disease (total 69 segments) due to degenerative changes, disc herniation, and/or osteophyte formation. They complained of axial neck pain and/or radiculopathy not responding to non-surgical measures. All the included subjects treated for more than one-disc disease using stand-alone polyetheretherketone. With minimum 2-years of regular, clinical and radiological follow up. We have assessed the patient for criterions defined for cage subsidence and protrusion, as well as pain assessment pre and postoperatively using the visual analog score. Results: we assessed 22 patients (73.3%) for two level pathology and 8 patients (26.7%) with three level diseases. Mean age was 48.2±8.9 years. Female to male ratio was (1.1:1). The most common segment involved was C5-6 segment in 83.3%. The pre-operative visual Analogue Score for axial neck pain 6.3±3.05 and radiculopathy 6.8±2.2 was decreased post-operatively to 2±1.3 points respectively. Subsidence and protrusion assessed by measurement of serial X rays and one patient 3.3% developed subsidence in 2 adjacent levels which is statistically not significant. No incidence of cage protrusion was detected. Conclusions: Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating provide good fusion, low subsidence rate, stability provided by the cage with excellent pain improvement.
多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和无钢板融合的疗效
背景与目的:单机聚醚醚酮笼在治疗一种以上颈椎间盘疾病患者中的安全性和有效性一直受到质疑。在这篇文章中,我们评估了不使用钢板的多节段前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合的安全性以及所达到的疼痛缓解。方法:在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了30例因退行性改变、椎间盘突出和/或骨赘形成而诊断为多节段颈椎间盘疾病(共69节段)的患者。他们主诉有轴颈痛和/或神经根病,非手术治疗无效。所有纳入的受试者均使用独立聚醚醚酮治疗单椎间盘以上疾病。至少有2年的定期临床和放射学随访。我们对患者进行了评估,确定了笼子下沉和突出的标准,并使用视觉模拟评分对术前和术后的疼痛进行了评估。结果:2级病变22例(73.3%),3级病变8例(26.7%)。平均年龄48.2±8.9岁。男女比例为(1.1:1)。最常见的是C5-6节段,占83.3%。轴性颈痛术前视觉模拟评分为6.3±3.05分,神经根病术前视觉模拟评分为6.8±2.2分,术后分别降至2±1.3分。通过连续X线测量评估沉陷和突出,1例(3.3%)患者在相邻2个水平发生沉陷,无统计学意义。未发现笼外突出的发生率。结论:颈椎前路多节段切除无钢板融合融合融合效果好,沉降率低,保持器稳定性好,疼痛改善效果好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信