Thinking about inclusion: Assessment of multiplatform apps for people with disability

Andrés Larco, Cesar Yanez, Vanessa Almendariz, S. Luján-Mora
{"title":"Thinking about inclusion: Assessment of multiplatform apps for people with disability","authors":"Andrés Larco, Cesar Yanez, Vanessa Almendariz, S. Luján-Mora","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of Information and Communication Technology for people with disability has become an opportunity to improve their education; however, the information and quality assessment of apps is unreliable. The overall purpose of the research was to identify multiplatform apps quality assessed with Mobile App Rating Scale that could help people with disability in their learning process. A systematic search was performed with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in specialized catalogs, Google, Google Play Store, and Apple App Store to identify apps for people with disability, such as autism, Down syndrome and cerebral palsy. Sixty apps were evaluated according to MARS items. The results were classified by disability, platform, and competences of life; each app had their own MARS score. Based on MARS total mean score it concludes that the work of evaluators was aligned with MARS guidelines. MARS scores and app list can be used to encourage therapists, parents, and people with disability the use of them. The evaluation revealed apps with a lack of customization and interactivity, features that are relevant to improve the learning process for people with disability.","PeriodicalId":102826,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of Information and Communication Technology for people with disability has become an opportunity to improve their education; however, the information and quality assessment of apps is unreliable. The overall purpose of the research was to identify multiplatform apps quality assessed with Mobile App Rating Scale that could help people with disability in their learning process. A systematic search was performed with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in specialized catalogs, Google, Google Play Store, and Apple App Store to identify apps for people with disability, such as autism, Down syndrome and cerebral palsy. Sixty apps were evaluated according to MARS items. The results were classified by disability, platform, and competences of life; each app had their own MARS score. Based on MARS total mean score it concludes that the work of evaluators was aligned with MARS guidelines. MARS scores and app list can be used to encourage therapists, parents, and people with disability the use of them. The evaluation revealed apps with a lack of customization and interactivity, features that are relevant to improve the learning process for people with disability.
关于包容性的思考:针对残疾人的多平台应用的评估
为残疾人士使用资讯及通讯科技,已成为他们改善教育的机会;然而,应用程序的信息和质量评估是不可靠的。这项研究的总体目的是通过手机应用评级量表来确定多平台应用的质量,从而帮助残疾人学习。在专业目录、Google、Google Play Store和Apple App Store中,使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行系统搜索,以确定适合自闭症、唐氏综合症和脑瘫等残疾人的应用程序。根据MARS项目评估了60个应用程序。结果按残疾、平台、生活能力进行分类;每个应用程序都有自己的MARS分数。根据MARS的总平均分得出结论,评估者的工作与MARS指南是一致的。MARS评分和应用程序列表可以用来鼓励治疗师、父母和残疾人使用它们。评估显示,这些应用程序缺乏定制和互动性,而这些功能与改善残疾人的学习过程有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信