An unconventional impression method using implant mount: an alternative to open-and closed-tray impression technique

Prakash Nidawani, Shiva Sai Vemula, Pooja Nagoji, Saumya Singh, Girish Galagali
{"title":"An unconventional impression method using implant mount: an alternative to open-and closed-tray impression technique","authors":"Prakash Nidawani, Shiva Sai Vemula, Pooja Nagoji, Saumya Singh, Girish Galagali","doi":"10.37983/ijdm.2023.5203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Various impression techniques have been proposed for making implant prostheses. Impressions are made at implant level –closed and open tray impressions, as well as abutment level impressions. Closed and open tray copings are used to make the impressions. The limitations associated with the implant impression copings, including expensive ones, pose a significant challenge in limited mouth-opening cases, and customization of copings is not feasible.Aim: This study aimed to compare the dimensional accuracy of four impression methods, open-tray, closed-tray, disposable mount as coping and splinted mount as coping.Materials and methods:An ideal maxillary edentulous acrylic model was used with windows created at the canine and molar regions. Four analogues were implanted in the canine and molar areas to represent implants. The analogues were parallel to one other and were orientated at 0 degrees using the surveyor's assistance. Four groups were made: closed-tray, open-tray, implant mount as coping and splinted mount as coping. The custom trays were fabricated, accordingly. The implant-level impressions were made in all the groups using polyether impression material. The impressions were fitted with their respective impression copings with the analogues. The impressions were poured using die stone type-IV, and the casts were made. The resulting casts were 3D scanned, and a virtual model (.stl File) was created. Each .stl file was subjected to Geomagic software to evaluate the three-dimensional accuracy of conventional implant copings and implant mount as copings. Results:The Open-tray and the closed-tray groups exhibited the mean dimensional accuracy of 0.011±0.0016 μm and 0.018±0.0012 μm, respectively. The mount as coping and splinted mount displayed a mean dimensional accuracy of 0.017±0.0008 μm and 0.013±0.0020μm, respectively.Conclusions:This pilot study concludes that the implant mountcan be used as implant impression coping and an alternative to the conventional impression coping.","PeriodicalId":132317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dental Materials","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37983/ijdm.2023.5203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Various impression techniques have been proposed for making implant prostheses. Impressions are made at implant level –closed and open tray impressions, as well as abutment level impressions. Closed and open tray copings are used to make the impressions. The limitations associated with the implant impression copings, including expensive ones, pose a significant challenge in limited mouth-opening cases, and customization of copings is not feasible.Aim: This study aimed to compare the dimensional accuracy of four impression methods, open-tray, closed-tray, disposable mount as coping and splinted mount as coping.Materials and methods:An ideal maxillary edentulous acrylic model was used with windows created at the canine and molar regions. Four analogues were implanted in the canine and molar areas to represent implants. The analogues were parallel to one other and were orientated at 0 degrees using the surveyor's assistance. Four groups were made: closed-tray, open-tray, implant mount as coping and splinted mount as coping. The custom trays were fabricated, accordingly. The implant-level impressions were made in all the groups using polyether impression material. The impressions were fitted with their respective impression copings with the analogues. The impressions were poured using die stone type-IV, and the casts were made. The resulting casts were 3D scanned, and a virtual model (.stl File) was created. Each .stl file was subjected to Geomagic software to evaluate the three-dimensional accuracy of conventional implant copings and implant mount as copings. Results:The Open-tray and the closed-tray groups exhibited the mean dimensional accuracy of 0.011±0.0016 μm and 0.018±0.0012 μm, respectively. The mount as coping and splinted mount displayed a mean dimensional accuracy of 0.017±0.0008 μm and 0.013±0.0020μm, respectively.Conclusions:This pilot study concludes that the implant mountcan be used as implant impression coping and an alternative to the conventional impression coping.
一种使用种植体固定的非常规压印方法:一种开放式和封闭式托盘压印技术的替代方法
背景:各种印模技术已被提出用于制作种植体假体。印模是在种植体水平-封闭和开放的托盘印模,以及基台水平印模。封闭和开放的托盘罩是用来做印象。种植体印模盖层的局限性,包括昂贵的盖层,在有限的开口病例中提出了重大挑战,定制盖层是不可行的。目的:比较开式托盘、闭式托盘、一次性垫顶和夹板垫顶四种压模方法的尺寸精度。材料和方法:采用理想的上颌无牙丙烯酸模型,在犬齿区和磨牙区建立窗口。在犬齿和臼齿区域植入四个类似物来代表种植体。这些类似物彼此平行,并在测量员的协助下以0度定向。分为四组:封闭式托盘组、开放式托盘组、种植体挂架为顶端组和夹板挂架为顶端组。因此,定制的托盘被制作出来。所有组均采用聚醚印模材料进行种植体水平印模。这些印象与它们各自的印象与类似物相匹配。用iv型模石浇铸印痕,制成铸件。最终的铸件进行了3D扫描,并建立了一个虚拟模型(。stl文件)已创建。每个。stl文件都经过Geomagic软件来评估常规种植体覆盖和种植体固定作为覆盖的三维精度。结果:开盘组和闭盘组的平均尺寸精度分别为0.011±0.0016 μm和0.018±0.0012 μm。顶置和夹板安装的平均尺寸精度分别为0.017±0.0008 μm和0.013±0.0020μm。结论:本初步研究的结论是种植体支架可以作为种植体压模顶,是传统压模顶的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信