{"title":"Advocates Should Use Applicable International Standards to Address Violations of Undocumented Migrant Workers in the United States","authors":"Constance de la Vega, Conchita Lozano-Batista","doi":"10.1163/EJ.9789004144835.I-599.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to provide migrant rights advocates with international legal arguments that can be used to address domestic human rights abuses when domestic law is inadequate and in violation of U.S. treaty obligations. It discusses applicable international law and suggests how these standards may be used to protect migrant workers. The article: describes the working conditions of undocumented migrants in the United States, highlighting recent violations of their human rights. It discusses Hoffman Plastics Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), which limited the rights of undocumented workers, and its aftermath and in which there were no briefs detailing relevant international legal obligations and binding treaty law that might have affected the outcome. This law and the methods for raising it in the United States are covered, with a specific focus on violations of the right to organize in order to be free from exploitative conditions, the right to equality before the law, and the right to legal recourse.This article also appears as chapter 21 of Anne Bayefsky, ed., Human Rights and Refugees, Internally Displaced Persons and Migrant Workers: Essays in Memory of Joan Fitzpatrick and Arthur Helton, (Leiden; Boston: M. Nijhoff, c2006).]","PeriodicalId":314073,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Transnational Labor Issues (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Transnational Labor Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004144835.I-599.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article seeks to provide migrant rights advocates with international legal arguments that can be used to address domestic human rights abuses when domestic law is inadequate and in violation of U.S. treaty obligations. It discusses applicable international law and suggests how these standards may be used to protect migrant workers. The article: describes the working conditions of undocumented migrants in the United States, highlighting recent violations of their human rights. It discusses Hoffman Plastics Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), which limited the rights of undocumented workers, and its aftermath and in which there were no briefs detailing relevant international legal obligations and binding treaty law that might have affected the outcome. This law and the methods for raising it in the United States are covered, with a specific focus on violations of the right to organize in order to be free from exploitative conditions, the right to equality before the law, and the right to legal recourse.This article also appears as chapter 21 of Anne Bayefsky, ed., Human Rights and Refugees, Internally Displaced Persons and Migrant Workers: Essays in Memory of Joan Fitzpatrick and Arthur Helton, (Leiden; Boston: M. Nijhoff, c2006).]
本文旨在为移民权利倡导者提供国际法律论据,以便在国内法不足和违反美国条约义务的情况下解决国内侵犯人权的问题。它讨论了适用的国际法,并建议如何利用这些标准来保护移徙工人。这篇文章描述了美国无证移民的工作条件,强调了最近对他们人权的侵犯。它讨论了Hoffman Plastics Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 535 U.S. 137(2002),这一限制无证工人权利的案件及其后果,其中没有详细说明可能影响结果的相关国际法律义务和有约束力的条约法。本书涵盖了这项法律以及在美国提出这项法律的方法,特别侧重于侵犯为摆脱剥削条件而组织起来的权利、法律面前人人平等的权利和诉诸法律的权利。这篇文章也出现在安妮·贝耶夫斯基编的《人权与难民、国内流离失所者和移民工人:纪念琼·菲茨帕特里克和阿瑟·赫尔顿的随笔》(莱顿;波士顿:M. Nijhoff, 2006)。