API Deprecation: A Systematic Mapping Study

Leif Bonorden
{"title":"API Deprecation: A Systematic Mapping Study","authors":"Leif Bonorden","doi":"10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are the prevalent interaction method for software modules, components, and systems. As systems and APIs evolve, an API element may be marked as deprecated, indicating that its use is disapproved or that the feature will be removed in an upcoming version. Consequently, deprecation is a means of communication between developers and, ideally, complemented by further documentation, including suggestions for the developers of the API’s clients.API deprecation is a relatively young research area that recently gained traction among researchers. To identify the current state of research as well as to identify open research areas, a meta-study that assesses scientific studies is necessary. Therefore, this paper presents a systematic mapping study on API deprecation to classify the state of the art and identify gaps in the research field. We identified and mapped 36 primary studies into a classification scheme comprising general and API-specific categories.We identified five major gaps in previous research on API deprecation as opportunities for future studies: studying remote APIs, investigating a broader range of static APIs, joining suppliers’ and clients’ views, including humans in studies, and avoiding deprecation.","PeriodicalId":269970,"journal":{"name":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are the prevalent interaction method for software modules, components, and systems. As systems and APIs evolve, an API element may be marked as deprecated, indicating that its use is disapproved or that the feature will be removed in an upcoming version. Consequently, deprecation is a means of communication between developers and, ideally, complemented by further documentation, including suggestions for the developers of the API’s clients.API deprecation is a relatively young research area that recently gained traction among researchers. To identify the current state of research as well as to identify open research areas, a meta-study that assesses scientific studies is necessary. Therefore, this paper presents a systematic mapping study on API deprecation to classify the state of the art and identify gaps in the research field. We identified and mapped 36 primary studies into a classification scheme comprising general and API-specific categories.We identified five major gaps in previous research on API deprecation as opportunities for future studies: studying remote APIs, investigating a broader range of static APIs, joining suppliers’ and clients’ views, including humans in studies, and avoiding deprecation.
API弃用:系统映射研究
应用程序编程接口(api)是软件模块、组件和系统的常用交互方法。随着系统和API的发展,一个API元素可能会被标记为已弃用,这表明它的使用不被批准,或者该特性将在即将到来的版本中被删除。因此,弃用是开发人员之间的一种通信方式,理想情况下,还可以通过进一步的文档(包括对API客户端开发人员的建议)加以补充。API弃用是一个相对年轻的研究领域,最近受到了研究人员的关注。为了确定研究的现状以及确定开放的研究领域,评估科学研究的元研究是必要的。因此,本文对API弃用进行了系统的映射研究,以分类最新技术并识别研究领域的差距。我们确定并绘制了36项主要研究的分类方案,包括一般和api特定类别。我们确定了先前关于API弃用的研究中的五个主要差距,作为未来研究的机会:研究远程API,调查更广泛的静态API,加入供应商和客户的观点,包括研究中的人类,以及避免弃用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信