Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not

U. Brandes
{"title":"Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not","authors":"U. Brandes","doi":"10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main algorithmic challenge in network visualization is the placement of nodes. While plenty of layout algorithms have been proposed, the vast majority of information visualization tools appears to utilize (sometimes a variant of) one of two algorithms: the approach of Fruchterman and Reingold or that of Kamada and Kawai. Both are often referred to as force-directed methods, or spring embedders, and praised for their general applicability, high adaptability, and simplicity. I will argue that commonly used implementations and even the approaches themselves are outdated and, in fact, have always been. They should be replaced by variants of multidimensional scaling that display superior results and scalability, and are just as flexible and easy to implement. Some of these statements may actually be backed by evidence.","PeriodicalId":127522,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The main algorithmic challenge in network visualization is the placement of nodes. While plenty of layout algorithms have been proposed, the vast majority of information visualization tools appears to utilize (sometimes a variant of) one of two algorithms: the approach of Fruchterman and Reingold or that of Kamada and Kawai. Both are often referred to as force-directed methods, or spring embedders, and praised for their general applicability, high adaptability, and simplicity. I will argue that commonly used implementations and even the approaches themselves are outdated and, in fact, have always been. They should be replaced by variants of multidimensional scaling that display superior results and scalability, and are just as flexible and easy to implement. Some of these statements may actually be backed by evidence.
主题演讲:为什么每个人似乎都在使用spring嵌入器来实现网络可视化,而不应该这样做
网络可视化的主要算法挑战是节点的放置。虽然已经提出了大量的布局算法,但绝大多数信息可视化工具似乎利用(有时是一种变体)以下两种算法之一:Fruchterman和Reingold的方法或Kamada和Kawai的方法。这两种方法通常被称为定向力方法或弹簧嵌入器,并因其普遍适用性、高适应性和简单性而受到称赞。我认为常用的实现甚至方法本身都是过时的,事实上,一直都是。它们应该被多维缩放的变体所取代,这些变体可以显示更好的结果和可伸缩性,并且同样灵活且易于实现。其中一些说法实际上是有证据支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信