Estimating Discounts for Lack of Marketability: Understanding Alternative Approaches—Put Options Versus Monetizing an Option Collar

Jay E. Fishman, B. O'rourke
{"title":"Estimating Discounts for Lack of Marketability: Understanding Alternative Approaches—Put Options Versus Monetizing an Option Collar","authors":"Jay E. Fishman, B. O'rourke","doi":"10.5791/0882-2875-35.3.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method for calculating a discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) has been a subject of debate for several years. Professionals have searched for alternatives to the traditional sources to quantify the DLOM. This search has led to increasing reliance on the use of financial derivatives to help determine a proxy for the DLOM. The most common derivative used to quantify DLOM is some form of put option. However, research is ongoing concerning the use of derivatives to estimate the DLOM. Recent literature has discussed the use of at-the-money collars and prepaid variable forward contracts to arrive at the DLOM. Another article in the spring 2015 edition of the Business Valuation Review takes a different position on how derivatives should be used to estimate a DLOM. This article highlights and discusses the differences between these approaches.","PeriodicalId":138737,"journal":{"name":"Business Valuation Review","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Valuation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5791/0882-2875-35.3.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The method for calculating a discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) has been a subject of debate for several years. Professionals have searched for alternatives to the traditional sources to quantify the DLOM. This search has led to increasing reliance on the use of financial derivatives to help determine a proxy for the DLOM. The most common derivative used to quantify DLOM is some form of put option. However, research is ongoing concerning the use of derivatives to estimate the DLOM. Recent literature has discussed the use of at-the-money collars and prepaid variable forward contracts to arrive at the DLOM. Another article in the spring 2015 edition of the Business Valuation Review takes a different position on how derivatives should be used to estimate a DLOM. This article highlights and discusses the differences between these approaches.
估计缺乏适销性的折扣:理解替代方法-看跌期权与期权领圈货币化
计算缺乏适销性折扣(DLOM)的方法已经争论了好几年。专业人士一直在寻找传统资源的替代方案来量化DLOM。这种搜索导致越来越依赖使用金融衍生品来帮助确定DLOM的代理。量化DLOM最常用的衍生品是某种形式的看跌期权。然而,关于使用衍生品来估计DLOM的研究正在进行中。最近的文献讨论了使用现价衣领和预付可变远期合约来达到DLOM。《商业评估评论》2015年春季版的另一篇文章对如何使用衍生品来评估DLOM采取了不同的立场。本文重点介绍并讨论了这些方法之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信