The Place of Wicked Problems in Engineering Problem Solving: A Proposed Taxonomy

B. Leech
{"title":"The Place of Wicked Problems in Engineering Problem Solving: A Proposed Taxonomy","authors":"B. Leech","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The engineering method is one of the key features of defining and identifying engineers. Engineering education overwhelmingly relies on well-structured problems to teach students the deductive process of breaking down problems into their components in order to find solutions. However, many of the problems facing society are not well-structured. This paper presents a taxonomy of different types of problems that engineers face based on both the structure of the problem (i.e., whether it is well-structured or ill-structured) and whether there is a previously identified solution space. The taxonomy includes four types of problem: Routine problems that are well-structured with established solutions; originative problems that are also well-structured, but have no established solution; Process-oriented problems that are ill-structured, but there are established solutions and methods for finding solutions; and Wicked problems that are ill-structured and have no pre-defined solutions. A study of the types of problems incorporated in engineering curricula in eight engineering programs is presented. The results show that there is an overwhelming reliance on well-structured problems, with an average of 95.4% of engineering courses using well-structured problems. Process-oriented problems are represented in an average of 5.6% of courses. originative problems are given in an average of 9.0% of courses. Wicked problems are not represented in any of the engineering courses.","PeriodicalId":207586,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Technology and Society","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The engineering method is one of the key features of defining and identifying engineers. Engineering education overwhelmingly relies on well-structured problems to teach students the deductive process of breaking down problems into their components in order to find solutions. However, many of the problems facing society are not well-structured. This paper presents a taxonomy of different types of problems that engineers face based on both the structure of the problem (i.e., whether it is well-structured or ill-structured) and whether there is a previously identified solution space. The taxonomy includes four types of problem: Routine problems that are well-structured with established solutions; originative problems that are also well-structured, but have no established solution; Process-oriented problems that are ill-structured, but there are established solutions and methods for finding solutions; and Wicked problems that are ill-structured and have no pre-defined solutions. A study of the types of problems incorporated in engineering curricula in eight engineering programs is presented. The results show that there is an overwhelming reliance on well-structured problems, with an average of 95.4% of engineering courses using well-structured problems. Process-oriented problems are represented in an average of 5.6% of courses. originative problems are given in an average of 9.0% of courses. Wicked problems are not represented in any of the engineering courses.
邪恶问题在工程问题解决中的地位:一个拟议的分类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信