Challenges and recommendation of clinical alarm system in intensive care units from user perspective

S. Thangavelu, E. Ifeachor, J. Edworthy, J. Yunus, K. Chinna
{"title":"Challenges and recommendation of clinical alarm system in intensive care units from user perspective","authors":"S. Thangavelu, E. Ifeachor, J. Edworthy, J. Yunus, K. Chinna","doi":"10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2014.6863059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are too many problems associated with clinical alarm system in Intensive Care Unit. This study was undertaken to identify and propose rectification to these problems to optimise alarm system performance. The objective of the study is to identify the problems associated with clinical alarm system in Intensive Care Units (ICU), determine the contributing factors and propose ways to improve clinical alarm. In conducting the study it would also be interesting to explore the difference in the way doctors and nurses respond towards alarm system problems. A survey was conducted with 161 clinicians, 137(85%) were registered nurses and medical assistants (MA) and 24(15%) were medical doctors from ICU. Prospective observation study was carried out for a total of 120hrs. Thereon interview sessions with focus group were conducted followed with task analysis to identify the root cause of alarm problems in ICU. In this survey, responses to triggered alarm show that there is no significant difference in the response to clinical alarm system by doctors and nurses. Findings show that 14% of the respondent ignored or switched off the alarm. Outcome of the survey and observation study show that too many alarms is the main problem identified by 78% (n=161, p<;0.001) of the respondent. The task analysis indicates this problem is due to lack of integration and harmonisation, improper limit setting, lack of physiological information, no prioritisation of alarms and lack of consideration of human factor in alarm design. Incorporation of these factors in the design can minimise the frequency of alarm triggered thereby improving the performance of the alarm system.","PeriodicalId":270495,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2014.6863059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There are too many problems associated with clinical alarm system in Intensive Care Unit. This study was undertaken to identify and propose rectification to these problems to optimise alarm system performance. The objective of the study is to identify the problems associated with clinical alarm system in Intensive Care Units (ICU), determine the contributing factors and propose ways to improve clinical alarm. In conducting the study it would also be interesting to explore the difference in the way doctors and nurses respond towards alarm system problems. A survey was conducted with 161 clinicians, 137(85%) were registered nurses and medical assistants (MA) and 24(15%) were medical doctors from ICU. Prospective observation study was carried out for a total of 120hrs. Thereon interview sessions with focus group were conducted followed with task analysis to identify the root cause of alarm problems in ICU. In this survey, responses to triggered alarm show that there is no significant difference in the response to clinical alarm system by doctors and nurses. Findings show that 14% of the respondent ignored or switched off the alarm. Outcome of the survey and observation study show that too many alarms is the main problem identified by 78% (n=161, p<;0.001) of the respondent. The task analysis indicates this problem is due to lack of integration and harmonisation, improper limit setting, lack of physiological information, no prioritisation of alarms and lack of consideration of human factor in alarm design. Incorporation of these factors in the design can minimise the frequency of alarm triggered thereby improving the performance of the alarm system.
重症监护病房临床报警系统的挑战与推荐
重症监护病房的临床报警系统存在很多问题。本研究的目的是确定并提出纠正这些问题的建议,以优化报警系统的性能。本研究旨在找出重症监护病房(ICU)临床报警系统存在的问题,确定其影响因素,并提出改善临床报警的方法。在进行这项研究时,探索医生和护士对警报系统问题的反应方式的差异也会很有趣。对161名临床医生进行调查,其中注册护士和医疗助理(MA) 137人(85%),ICU内科医生24人(15%)。前瞻性观察研究共进行120小时。在此基础上进行焦点小组访谈,然后进行任务分析,以确定ICU报警问题的根本原因。在本次调查中,对触发报警的反应表明,医生和护士对临床报警系统的反应没有显著差异。调查结果显示,14%的受访者忽略或关闭了警报。调查和观察研究结果显示,78% (n=161, p< 0.001)的受访者认为报警过多是主要问题。任务分析表明,这一问题是由于缺乏整合和协调,限制设置不当,缺乏生理信息,没有优先级报警和在报警设计中缺乏对人为因素的考虑。在设计中结合这些因素可以最大限度地减少触发报警的频率,从而提高报警系统的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信