COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATIONS ON BALLISTIC BACKFACE DEFLECTIONS OF COMBAT HELMETS USING FORCE MEASUREMENT AND DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION

Steffen GroBert, M. Seidl, H. Gedon, S. Peldschus, O. Peschel
{"title":"COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATIONS ON BALLISTIC BACKFACE DEFLECTIONS OF COMBAT HELMETS USING FORCE MEASUREMENT AND DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION","authors":"Steffen GroBert, M. Seidl, H. Gedon, S. Peldschus, O. Peschel","doi":"10.12783/ballistics22/36113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present work two different measurement methods are compared for the analysis of ballistic caused “dynamic backface deflections” (BFD): a conservative force measurement and an optical measurement with digital image correlation (DIC). An aramid fibre combat helmet, meeting the requirements of VPAM 3, was analysed with the two methods under the same ballistic conditions (frontal impact, 9 mm x 19 full metal jacket (FMJ); 410 m/s). The force measurement resulted in a cumulative total force of 7.2 kN. A maximum BFD of 22 mm at a maximum speed of 110 m/s was determined using the DIC method. Both methods showed a constant load duration respectively deformation duration of 0.5 ms while the noncontact DIC measurement method resulted in a 120% deeper permanent BFD. Considering the significant limitations of both methods, the force measurement method was evaluated as the more advantageous method for further analysis of realistic, ballistic caused blunt head loads.","PeriodicalId":211716,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Ballistics","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Ballistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12783/ballistics22/36113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present work two different measurement methods are compared for the analysis of ballistic caused “dynamic backface deflections” (BFD): a conservative force measurement and an optical measurement with digital image correlation (DIC). An aramid fibre combat helmet, meeting the requirements of VPAM 3, was analysed with the two methods under the same ballistic conditions (frontal impact, 9 mm x 19 full metal jacket (FMJ); 410 m/s). The force measurement resulted in a cumulative total force of 7.2 kN. A maximum BFD of 22 mm at a maximum speed of 110 m/s was determined using the DIC method. Both methods showed a constant load duration respectively deformation duration of 0.5 ms while the noncontact DIC measurement method resulted in a 120% deeper permanent BFD. Considering the significant limitations of both methods, the force measurement method was evaluated as the more advantageous method for further analysis of realistic, ballistic caused blunt head loads.
基于力测量和数字图像相关的作战头盔弹道后面偏转比较研究
本文比较了两种不同的测量方法用于分析弹道引起的“动态背面挠度”(BFD):保守力测量和数字图像相关光学测量(DIC)。以满足VPAM 3要求的芳纶纤维战斗头盔为研究对象,在相同的弹道条件下(正面撞击,9 mm × 19全金属护套(FMJ);410米/秒)。测力结果显示,累计总力为7.2 kN。在最大速度为110 m/s时,采用DIC方法确定了最大BFD为22 mm。两种方法均显示恒定载荷持续时间,变形持续时间均为0.5 ms,而非接触式DIC测量方法的永久BFD深度为120%。考虑到两种方法的显著局限性,力测量方法被评估为更有利的方法,用于进一步分析现实的,弹道引起的钝头载荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信