Lessons and Memories of the Titanic, (1912-2012)

C. Maitland
{"title":"Lessons and Memories of the Titanic, (1912-2012)","authors":"C. Maitland","doi":"10.5957/icetech-2012-m-tt-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical legacy of the TITANIC defies a brief manuscript of 20- plus pages. Much better, and more detailed work has been done to give the subject a “modern” context, notably by the United States Coast Guard in the Summer 2012 issue of Proceedings of the Marine Safety and Security Council, vol.69, no. 2, from which the following remarks draw heavily.\n The night of April 14, 1912 – the famous “night to remember,” chosen by Walter Lord as the title of his excellent history – presents us with many questions that will probably never be answered. Most of these are technical: the “what ifs” that, in one form or another, haunt us after, but usually not before, a disaster at sea.\n The importance of safety at sea is shown by the pictures available since 1985, showing the broken fragments of wreckage lying on the ocean floor south of Cape Race. Since the wreckage was located, we can see the pairs of empty shoes and boots that mark where human remains once lay.\n The TITANIC facts are familiar: at 11:40 P.M. on April 14, 1912, she collided with an iceberg. Two hours and 40 minutes later, the pride of the White Star Line began her two-mile plunge to the bottom of the North Atlantic. Of the 2,224 passengers and crew aboard, only 710 survived. While there have been sea disasters that produced greater loss of life, the sinking of TITANIC is probably the most famous and far-reaching maritime disaster in history.\n While the loss of TITANIC has been described as “perhaps the most documented and least commonly understood marine casualty in maritime history”, a positive result of the TITANIC disaster, and of course many other tragedies at sea that have occurred since, has been to establish a formal protocol of goals and procedures for analysis and investigation. These goals, from the point of view of the investigator/flag state, other governments, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), and other regulators, is the identification of unsafe conditions, in order to identify them in advance of future disasters. Today, responsible regimes charged with administration of the safety of life at sea are said to follow a philosophy of prevention first and, then, response.\n The 1985 discovery of the wreck of the TITANIC sparked a new round of forensic investigation. The bow section was found largely intact with the stern section in hundreds of pieces approximately 2,000 feet away. The realization that TITANIC’s hull had broken at some point during the sinking added a new understanding of the already famous disaster. The discovery of the wreck also provided new forensic evidence in the form of recovered artifacts and detailed surveys. It was these new clues and advances in computer-driven engineering tools that gave rise to a revision of previously held beliefs.\n The significance of the TITANIC, and the events that led to such a large loss of life, remain with us today.","PeriodicalId":146632,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 17, 2012","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 17, 2012","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/icetech-2012-m-tt-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The historical legacy of the TITANIC defies a brief manuscript of 20- plus pages. Much better, and more detailed work has been done to give the subject a “modern” context, notably by the United States Coast Guard in the Summer 2012 issue of Proceedings of the Marine Safety and Security Council, vol.69, no. 2, from which the following remarks draw heavily. The night of April 14, 1912 – the famous “night to remember,” chosen by Walter Lord as the title of his excellent history – presents us with many questions that will probably never be answered. Most of these are technical: the “what ifs” that, in one form or another, haunt us after, but usually not before, a disaster at sea. The importance of safety at sea is shown by the pictures available since 1985, showing the broken fragments of wreckage lying on the ocean floor south of Cape Race. Since the wreckage was located, we can see the pairs of empty shoes and boots that mark where human remains once lay. The TITANIC facts are familiar: at 11:40 P.M. on April 14, 1912, she collided with an iceberg. Two hours and 40 minutes later, the pride of the White Star Line began her two-mile plunge to the bottom of the North Atlantic. Of the 2,224 passengers and crew aboard, only 710 survived. While there have been sea disasters that produced greater loss of life, the sinking of TITANIC is probably the most famous and far-reaching maritime disaster in history. While the loss of TITANIC has been described as “perhaps the most documented and least commonly understood marine casualty in maritime history”, a positive result of the TITANIC disaster, and of course many other tragedies at sea that have occurred since, has been to establish a formal protocol of goals and procedures for analysis and investigation. These goals, from the point of view of the investigator/flag state, other governments, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), and other regulators, is the identification of unsafe conditions, in order to identify them in advance of future disasters. Today, responsible regimes charged with administration of the safety of life at sea are said to follow a philosophy of prevention first and, then, response. The 1985 discovery of the wreck of the TITANIC sparked a new round of forensic investigation. The bow section was found largely intact with the stern section in hundreds of pieces approximately 2,000 feet away. The realization that TITANIC’s hull had broken at some point during the sinking added a new understanding of the already famous disaster. The discovery of the wreck also provided new forensic evidence in the form of recovered artifacts and detailed surveys. It was these new clues and advances in computer-driven engineering tools that gave rise to a revision of previously held beliefs. The significance of the TITANIC, and the events that led to such a large loss of life, remain with us today.
泰坦尼克号的教训与回忆(1912-2012)
泰坦尼克号的历史遗产远非一份20多页的简短手稿所能描述。美国海岸警卫队在2012年夏季出版的《海洋安全与安全理事会论文集》(Proceedings of the maritime Safety and Security Council,第69卷,no. 69)中做了更好、更详细的工作,为这一主题提供了一个“现代”背景。2、下面的评论主要是从这一点得出的。1912年4月14日的夜晚——著名的“值得记住的夜晚”,沃尔特·洛德(Walter Lord)选择这个夜晚作为他的优秀历史著作的标题——向我们提出了许多可能永远无法回答的问题。其中大多数都是技术性的:在海上灾难发生后,以这样或那样的形式困扰着我们的“假设”,而通常不是在灾难发生之前。从1985年以来的照片可以看出海上安全的重要性,这些照片显示了在开普雷斯以南的海底躺着破碎的残骸碎片。由于残骸已经定位,我们可以看到空鞋和空靴子,这标志着人类遗骸曾经躺过的地方。泰坦尼克号的事实大家都很熟悉:1912年4月14日晚上11点40分,泰坦尼克号撞上了一座冰山。两小时四十分钟后,白星航运公司的骄傲号开始向北大西洋海底俯冲两英里。机上2224名乘客和机组人员中,只有710人幸存。虽然也有海难造成更大的生命损失,但泰坦尼克号的沉没可能是历史上最著名和影响最深远的海难。虽然泰坦尼克号的损失被描述为“可能是海事历史上记录最多、最不为人所知的海上事故”,但泰坦尼克号灾难以及自那以后发生的许多其他海上悲剧的一个积极结果是,建立了一套正式的分析和调查目标和程序协议。从调查人员/船旗国、其他政府、国际海事组织(IMO)和其他监管机构的角度来看,这些目标是识别不安全条件,以便在未来的灾难发生之前识别它们。今天,据说负责管理海上生命安全的负责任的制度遵循一种先预防后应对的哲学。1985年泰坦尼克号残骸的发现引发了新一轮的法医调查。船首部分基本上完好无损,船尾部分在大约2000英尺外被发现。人们意识到泰坦尼克号的船体在沉没过程中的某个时刻破裂了,这让人们对这场已经广为人知的灾难有了新的认识。沉船的发现还以回收的文物和详细调查的形式提供了新的法医证据。正是这些新的线索和计算机驱动的工程工具的进步,引起了对先前信念的修正。泰坦尼克号的意义,以及导致如此巨大生命损失的事件,今天仍与我们同在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信