The Ph.D.-candidate as an information literate resource: developing research support and information literacy skills in an informal setting

H. Daland
{"title":"The Ph.D.-candidate as an information literate resource: developing research support and information literacy skills in an informal setting","authors":"H. Daland","doi":"10.18352/LQ.9214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at suggesting a new way of developing research support for PhD-candidates. Previous research on the field of research support greatly focuses on the librarians’ competencies and how to assist researchers with what they lack in information literacy (IL) skills. There is little focus on collaboration with researchers to achieve a mutual learning outcome in regard to developing research support and IL skills. A socio-cultural view on IL indicates that IL skills are developed in a context, and therefore are situated. A high level of IL in one situation could be regarded as insufficient in another. Therefore, a librarian’s view on IL could be incomparable to a PhD-student’s everyday information needs. Many liaison librarians do not have a PhD, but are still expected to provide PhD-candidates with research support of high quality. How can we do so if we only see the librarian’s perspective? Can informal settings and user involvement be a productive way of developing research support and IL skills? As librarians it is not always easy to know what researchers need. However, if the threshold has been lowered, in an informal setting, one might obtain the questions that reveal difficulties for researchers when it comes to library services and resources. Also, through user involvement, the researchers can teach librarians about the research process. This study includes an anonymous survey among PhD-candidates at the Faculty of Humanities and Education at the University of Agder (UoA) and interviews with two of the PhD-candidates in addition to interviews with all of Agder University Library’s (AUL) liaison librarians. In general, PhD-candidates that interact informally with their liaison librarian have a higher confidence in their own overview when it comes to library resources. They do not have problems contacting their librarians for help, but they do not expect the librarians to do their searching for them.","PeriodicalId":357594,"journal":{"name":"The Liber Quarterly","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Liber Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/LQ.9214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article aims at suggesting a new way of developing research support for PhD-candidates. Previous research on the field of research support greatly focuses on the librarians’ competencies and how to assist researchers with what they lack in information literacy (IL) skills. There is little focus on collaboration with researchers to achieve a mutual learning outcome in regard to developing research support and IL skills. A socio-cultural view on IL indicates that IL skills are developed in a context, and therefore are situated. A high level of IL in one situation could be regarded as insufficient in another. Therefore, a librarian’s view on IL could be incomparable to a PhD-student’s everyday information needs. Many liaison librarians do not have a PhD, but are still expected to provide PhD-candidates with research support of high quality. How can we do so if we only see the librarian’s perspective? Can informal settings and user involvement be a productive way of developing research support and IL skills? As librarians it is not always easy to know what researchers need. However, if the threshold has been lowered, in an informal setting, one might obtain the questions that reveal difficulties for researchers when it comes to library services and resources. Also, through user involvement, the researchers can teach librarians about the research process. This study includes an anonymous survey among PhD-candidates at the Faculty of Humanities and Education at the University of Agder (UoA) and interviews with two of the PhD-candidates in addition to interviews with all of Agder University Library’s (AUL) liaison librarians. In general, PhD-candidates that interact informally with their liaison librarian have a higher confidence in their own overview when it comes to library resources. They do not have problems contacting their librarians for help, but they do not expect the librarians to do their searching for them.
作为信息素养资源的博士候选人:在非正式环境中发展研究支持和信息素养技能
本文旨在提出一条发展博士生科研支持的新途径。以往在研究支持领域的研究主要集中在图书馆员的能力以及如何帮助研究人员弥补信息素养方面的不足。在发展研究支持和IL技能方面,很少关注与研究人员的合作,以实现相互学习的结果。对IL的社会文化观点表明,IL技能是在一个语境中发展起来的,因此是定位的。一种情况下的高IL水平在另一种情况下可能被认为是不足的。因此,图书管理员对IL的看法可能无法与博士生的日常信息需求相提并论。许多联络员没有博士学位,但仍被期望为博士候选人提供高质量的研究支持。如果我们只从图书管理员的角度出发,我们如何做到这一点呢?非正式环境和用户参与能否成为发展研究支持和IL技能的有效方式?作为图书管理员,要知道研究人员需要什么并不总是容易的。然而,如果门槛降低了,在非正式的环境中,人们可能会得到一些问题,这些问题揭示了研究人员在图书馆服务和资源方面的困难。此外,通过用户参与,研究人员可以向图书馆员传授研究过程。这项研究包括对阿格德大学人文与教育学院的博士候选人进行匿名调查,并采访了两位博士候选人,此外还采访了阿格德大学图书馆(AUL)的所有联络馆员。一般来说,与联络员进行非正式互动的博士候选人在图书馆资源方面对自己的概况有更高的信心。他们联系图书管理员寻求帮助没有问题,但他们不指望图书管理员帮他们搜索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信