The social significance of the regulation of non-cri- minal acts in the criminal law

D. A. Gаrbatovich
{"title":"The social significance of the regulation of non-cri- minal acts in the criminal law","authors":"D. A. Gаrbatovich","doi":"10.37399/2686-9241.2021.1.51-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In science, it is already proved that the effectiveness of criminal legislation in relation to crime prevention is very limited. The criminal law is objectively unable to eliminate the causes of crime due to their social nature. Nevertheless, the regulation of non-criminal acts is a socially significant area of criminal law policy that helps to resolve or reduce the painful difficulties that arise in the process of law-making and law enforcement activities in relation to the criminal law. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of the research is based on Russian doctrinal sources devoted to modern concepts of criminal policy, forms and means of its implementation, and the social consequences of mitigating or toughening criminal repression. Results. The social importance of the regulation of non-criminal legal acts is determined by the ability to resolve three central problems. Firstly law-making activities when determining the boundaries of criminalisation. Secondly, maintaining human resources to implement repressive penal policy. Thirdly conservation of the economic resource, as the impact of penal policy and define ensuring the principle of inevitability of criminal responsibility and alternative ways to resolve a criminal law conflict. This includes the possibility of self-defense of individual rights by means of criminal law. Discussion and Conclusion. Regulation of non-criminal acts is a kind of “safety mechanism” of criminal law policy. It is a means of protection against excessive criminalisation, a means of ensuring compliance of legislative formulas with the realities of life, and a means of ensuring a balance between lawmaking and law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":184770,"journal":{"name":"Pravosudie / Justice","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravosudie / Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2021.1.51-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In science, it is already proved that the effectiveness of criminal legislation in relation to crime prevention is very limited. The criminal law is objectively unable to eliminate the causes of crime due to their social nature. Nevertheless, the regulation of non-criminal acts is a socially significant area of criminal law policy that helps to resolve or reduce the painful difficulties that arise in the process of law-making and law enforcement activities in relation to the criminal law. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of the research is based on Russian doctrinal sources devoted to modern concepts of criminal policy, forms and means of its implementation, and the social consequences of mitigating or toughening criminal repression. Results. The social importance of the regulation of non-criminal legal acts is determined by the ability to resolve three central problems. Firstly law-making activities when determining the boundaries of criminalisation. Secondly, maintaining human resources to implement repressive penal policy. Thirdly conservation of the economic resource, as the impact of penal policy and define ensuring the principle of inevitability of criminal responsibility and alternative ways to resolve a criminal law conflict. This includes the possibility of self-defense of individual rights by means of criminal law. Discussion and Conclusion. Regulation of non-criminal acts is a kind of “safety mechanism” of criminal law policy. It is a means of protection against excessive criminalisation, a means of ensuring compliance of legislative formulas with the realities of life, and a means of ensuring a balance between lawmaking and law enforcement.
刑法对非犯罪行为进行规制的社会意义
介绍。科学已经证明,刑事立法在预防犯罪方面的效力十分有限。刑法由于其社会性质在客观上无法消除犯罪原因。然而,对非犯罪行为的管制是刑法政策的一个具有社会意义的领域,它有助于解决或减少在与刑法有关的立法和执法活动过程中出现的痛苦困难。理论基础。方法。这项研究的理论基础是基于专门研究现代刑事政策概念、执行刑事政策的形式和手段以及减轻或加强刑事镇压的社会后果的俄罗斯理论来源。结果。规制非刑事法律行为的社会重要性取决于能否解决三个核心问题。一是确定刑事定罪界限时的立法活动。第二,维持人力资源以执行镇压性刑罚政策。第三,经济资源的保护,作为刑事政策的影响,界定了确保刑事责任的必然性原则和解决刑法冲突的替代途径。这包括通过刑法手段对个人权利进行自卫的可能性。讨论与结论。对非犯罪行为的规制是刑法政策的一种“安全机制”。它是防止过度定罪的一种手段,是确保立法公式符合生活现实的一种手段,是确保立法和执法之间取得平衡的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信