ADVANTAGES AND FEATURES OF ARTHROSCOPIC REINSERTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT OF THE KNEE JOINT WITH INTERNAL SPLINTING (internal brace technology)

V. Lutsyshyn, V. M. Maiko, Y. Filonenko, O. Maiko
{"title":"ADVANTAGES AND FEATURES OF ARTHROSCOPIC REINSERTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT OF THE KNEE JOINT WITH INTERNAL SPLINTING (internal brace technology)","authors":"V. Lutsyshyn, V. M. Maiko, Y. Filonenko, O. Maiko","doi":"10.51309/2411-6858-2021-20-1-18-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Despite the annual increase in the number of patients with knee injuries, there is no gen-erally accepted algorithm for treating patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL). Conservative treatment is ineffective, as in 75-87% gives chronic anterior medial instability, increases the risk of post-traumatic arthritis by 51,2%. There is a considerable interest in arthroscopic primary recovery of ACL.\nThe aim of the study is to evaluate the results of treatment of patients with ACL rapture and to develop a differentiated approach in its treatment.\nMaterials and methods. The results of treatment of patients with ACl rupture who underwent ligament reinsertion (n = 40) and ACL reconstruction (n = 50) were analyzed. The assessment was performed on the scale of VAS for 2 days, VAS and IKDC 2-6-12 weeks after surgery\nResults. On the second day after the ligament reinsertion, patients had less pain compared to their post-reconstruction sensations: VAS 4,1 versus 5,3. In the group of patients after reinsertion of ACL in the period of 2-6 weeks there were lower rates of pain, namely 2,25 compared with 3,4 in the group of ACL reconstruction. At 2 weeks after reinsertion, patients reported moderate pain and an activity level of 66,4 ± 3,5 compared with the 61,3 ± 2,6 ligament reconstruction group on the IKDC scale. At 6 weeks, the positive dynamics persists, 80,2 ± 2,8 and 76,9 ± 3,1 IKDC, respectively. In 12 weeks, patients in both groups recover almost completely and return to daily activity, 93,9 ± 3,6 and 91,7 ± 2,4 on the IKDC scale, respectively.\nConclusions. Primary recovery for proximal ACL ruptures shows good results and may be an alternative to ACL reconstruction. Success is based on the location of the ligament rupture and the tissues quality. The possibility of the initial ACL recovery is solved during surgery. If there is any doubt about the suitability of tissues for recovery, it is recommended to perform a standard reconstruction of ACL.","PeriodicalId":341155,"journal":{"name":"The problems of traumatology and osteosynthesis","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The problems of traumatology and osteosynthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51309/2411-6858-2021-20-1-18-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Despite the annual increase in the number of patients with knee injuries, there is no gen-erally accepted algorithm for treating patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL). Conservative treatment is ineffective, as in 75-87% gives chronic anterior medial instability, increases the risk of post-traumatic arthritis by 51,2%. There is a considerable interest in arthroscopic primary recovery of ACL. The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of treatment of patients with ACL rapture and to develop a differentiated approach in its treatment. Materials and methods. The results of treatment of patients with ACl rupture who underwent ligament reinsertion (n = 40) and ACL reconstruction (n = 50) were analyzed. The assessment was performed on the scale of VAS for 2 days, VAS and IKDC 2-6-12 weeks after surgery Results. On the second day after the ligament reinsertion, patients had less pain compared to their post-reconstruction sensations: VAS 4,1 versus 5,3. In the group of patients after reinsertion of ACL in the period of 2-6 weeks there were lower rates of pain, namely 2,25 compared with 3,4 in the group of ACL reconstruction. At 2 weeks after reinsertion, patients reported moderate pain and an activity level of 66,4 ± 3,5 compared with the 61,3 ± 2,6 ligament reconstruction group on the IKDC scale. At 6 weeks, the positive dynamics persists, 80,2 ± 2,8 and 76,9 ± 3,1 IKDC, respectively. In 12 weeks, patients in both groups recover almost completely and return to daily activity, 93,9 ± 3,6 and 91,7 ± 2,4 on the IKDC scale, respectively. Conclusions. Primary recovery for proximal ACL ruptures shows good results and may be an alternative to ACL reconstruction. Success is based on the location of the ligament rupture and the tissues quality. The possibility of the initial ACL recovery is solved during surgery. If there is any doubt about the suitability of tissues for recovery, it is recommended to perform a standard reconstruction of ACL.
关节镜下内夹板植入膝关节前交叉韧带(内支架技术)的优点和特点
背景。尽管膝关节损伤患者的数量每年都在增加,但对于前交叉韧带损伤(ACL)患者的治疗还没有普遍接受的算法。保守治疗无效,75-87%的患者会出现慢性前内侧不稳,使创伤后关节炎的风险增加51.2%。关节镜下前交叉韧带的初步恢复有相当大的兴趣。本研究的目的是评估前交叉韧带断裂患者的治疗结果,并制定一种差异化的治疗方法。材料和方法。对40例前交叉韧带破裂患者行韧带置入术和前交叉韧带重建术的治疗结果进行分析。术后2 d采用VAS评分,术后2-6周采用IKDC评分。在韧带重新植入后的第二天,患者的疼痛感比重建后的感觉更少:VAS评分为4,1比5,3。前交叉韧带重建组2-6周疼痛发生率较前交叉韧带重建组低,为2,25,而前交叉韧带重建组为3,4。在重新植入后2周,患者报告中度疼痛,IKDC评分为66,4±3,5,而韧带重建组为61,3±2,6。在6周时,积极动力持续存在,分别为80,2±2,8和76,9±3,1 IKDC。12周后,两组患者的IKDC评分分别为93,9±3,6和91,7±2,4,几乎完全恢复并恢复日常活动。近端前交叉韧带断裂的初步恢复显示出良好的效果,可能是前交叉韧带重建的替代方法。成功与否取决于韧带断裂的位置和组织质量。最初ACL恢复的可能性在手术中得到解决。如果对组织恢复的适宜性有任何疑问,建议对前交叉韧带进行标准重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信