Geometric models for plant leaf area estimation from 3D point clouds: A comparative study

Mélinda Boukhana , Joris Ravaglia , Franck Hétroy-Wheeler , Benoît De Solan
{"title":"Geometric models for plant leaf area estimation from 3D point clouds: A comparative study","authors":"Mélinda Boukhana ,&nbsp;Joris Ravaglia ,&nbsp;Franck Hétroy-Wheeler ,&nbsp;Benoît De Solan","doi":"10.1016/j.gvc.2022.200057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measuring leaf area is a critical task in plant biology. Meshing techniques, parametric surface modelling and implicit surface modelling allow estimating plant leaf area from acquired 3D point clouds. However, there is currently no consensus on the best approach because of little comparative evaluation. In this paper, we provide evidence about the performance of each approach, through a comparative study of four meshing, three parametric modelling and one implicit modelling methods. All selected methods are freely available and easy to use. We have also performed a parameter sensitivity analysis for each method in order to optimise its results and fully automate its use. We identified nine criteria affecting the robustness of the studied methods. These criteria are related to either the leaf shape (length/width ratio, curviness, concavity) or the acquisition process (e.g. sampling density, noise, misalignment, holes). We used synthetic data to quantitatively evaluate the robustness of the selected approaches with respect to each criterion. In addition we evaluated the results of these approaches on five tree and crop datasets acquired with laser scanners or photogrammetry. This study allows us to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of each method and evaluate its appropriateness in a given scenario. Our main conclusion is that fitting a Bézier surface is the most robust and accurate approach to estimate plant leaf area in most cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100592,"journal":{"name":"Graphics and Visual Computing","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 200057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666629422000109/pdfft?md5=25be04dddcbb2772af70ad36542ad31c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666629422000109-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graphics and Visual Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666629422000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Measuring leaf area is a critical task in plant biology. Meshing techniques, parametric surface modelling and implicit surface modelling allow estimating plant leaf area from acquired 3D point clouds. However, there is currently no consensus on the best approach because of little comparative evaluation. In this paper, we provide evidence about the performance of each approach, through a comparative study of four meshing, three parametric modelling and one implicit modelling methods. All selected methods are freely available and easy to use. We have also performed a parameter sensitivity analysis for each method in order to optimise its results and fully automate its use. We identified nine criteria affecting the robustness of the studied methods. These criteria are related to either the leaf shape (length/width ratio, curviness, concavity) or the acquisition process (e.g. sampling density, noise, misalignment, holes). We used synthetic data to quantitatively evaluate the robustness of the selected approaches with respect to each criterion. In addition we evaluated the results of these approaches on five tree and crop datasets acquired with laser scanners or photogrammetry. This study allows us to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of each method and evaluate its appropriateness in a given scenario. Our main conclusion is that fitting a Bézier surface is the most robust and accurate approach to estimate plant leaf area in most cases.

基于三维点云的植物叶面积估算几何模型的比较研究
测量叶面积是植物生物学中的一项重要任务。网格技术,参数化表面建模和隐式表面建模允许从获得的三维点云估计植物叶面积。然而,由于很少进行比较评价,目前对最佳方法没有达成共识。在本文中,我们通过对四种网格、三种参数建模和一种隐式建模方法的比较研究,提供了每种方法性能的证据。所有选择的方法都是免费的,并且易于使用。我们还对每种方法进行了参数敏感性分析,以优化其结果并完全自动化其使用。我们确定了影响研究方法稳健性的九个标准。这些标准与叶片形状(长/宽比、弯曲度、凹凸度)或采集过程(例如采样密度、噪声、不对准、孔洞)有关。我们使用合成数据来定量评估所选方法相对于每个标准的稳健性。此外,我们用激光扫描仪或摄影测量获得的5个树木和作物数据集评估了这些方法的结果。这项研究使我们能够突出每种方法的优点和缺点,并评估其在给定场景中的适用性。我们的主要结论是,在大多数情况下,拟合bsamzier曲面是估计植物叶面积最可靠和最准确的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信