{"title":"Towards Automatic Identification of Discourse Markers in Dialogs: The Case of Like","authors":"S. Zufferey, Andrei Popescu-Belis","doi":"10.7892/BORIS.78686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the detection of discourse \n markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions, \nby human annotators and by automated \nmeans. After a theoretical discussion of the \ndefinition of DMs and their relevance to natural \n language processing, we focus on the role \nof like as a DM. Results from experiments \nwith human annotators show that detection of \nDMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires \n prosodic information from soundtracks. \nThen, several types of features are defined for \nautomatic disambiguation of like: collocations, \n part-of-speech tags and duration-based \nfeatures. Decision-tree learning shows that for \nlike, nearly 70% precision can be reached, \nwith near 100% recall, mainly using collocation \n filters. Similar results hold for well, with \nabout 91% precision at 100% recall.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.78686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Abstract
This article discusses the detection of discourse
markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions,
by human annotators and by automated
means. After a theoretical discussion of the
definition of DMs and their relevance to natural
language processing, we focus on the role
of like as a DM. Results from experiments
with human annotators show that detection of
DMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires
prosodic information from soundtracks.
Then, several types of features are defined for
automatic disambiguation of like: collocations,
part-of-speech tags and duration-based
features. Decision-tree learning shows that for
like, nearly 70% precision can be reached,
with near 100% recall, mainly using collocation
filters. Similar results hold for well, with
about 91% precision at 100% recall.