Towards Automatic Identification of Discourse Markers in Dialogs: The Case of Like

S. Zufferey, Andrei Popescu-Belis
{"title":"Towards Automatic Identification of Discourse Markers in Dialogs: The Case of Like","authors":"S. Zufferey, Andrei Popescu-Belis","doi":"10.7892/BORIS.78686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the detection of discourse \n markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions, \nby human annotators and by automated \nmeans. After a theoretical discussion of the \ndefinition of DMs and their relevance to natural \n language processing, we focus on the role \nof like as a DM. Results from experiments \nwith human annotators show that detection of \nDMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires \n prosodic information from soundtracks. \nThen, several types of features are defined for \nautomatic disambiguation of like: collocations, \n part-of-speech tags and duration-based \nfeatures. Decision-tree learning shows that for \nlike, nearly 70% precision can be reached, \nwith near 100% recall, mainly using collocation \n filters. Similar results hold for well, with \nabout 91% precision at 100% recall.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.78686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

This article discusses the detection of discourse markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions, by human annotators and by automated means. After a theoretical discussion of the definition of DMs and their relevance to natural language processing, we focus on the role of like as a DM. Results from experiments with human annotators show that detection of DMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires prosodic information from soundtracks. Then, several types of features are defined for automatic disambiguation of like: collocations, part-of-speech tags and duration-based features. Decision-tree learning shows that for like, nearly 70% precision can be reached, with near 100% recall, mainly using collocation filters. Similar results hold for well, with about 91% precision at 100% recall.
对话中话语标记的自动识别:以相似为例
本文讨论了对话文本中话语标记(DM)的检测方法,包括人工注释器和自动化方法。在对DM的定义及其与自然语言处理的相关性进行了理论讨论之后,我们将重点放在like作为DM的作用上。人类注释器的实验结果表明,检测DM是一项困难但可靠的任务,这需要来自音轨的韵律信息。然后,定义了几种类型的自动消歧特征:搭配、词性标签和基于持续时间的特征。决策树学习表明,对于like,主要使用搭配过滤器,准确率接近70%,召回率接近100%。类似的结果也很好,在100%召回率下,准确率约为91%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信