Social Health and Quality of Life in Health Workers in Qorveh and Dehgolan, 2019

M. Maleki, S. Janmohammadi, Z. Ahmadi, H. Haghani
{"title":"Social Health and Quality of Life in Health Workers in Qorveh and Dehgolan, 2019","authors":"M. Maleki, S. Janmohammadi, Z. Ahmadi, H. Haghani","doi":"10.52547/ijn.33.128.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims: Health workers are the most fundamental elements of the health system whose mission is to improve the health of the rural community. Assessing and measuring the level of health is one of the important health issues. Health is a broad concept with multiple dimensions including physical, mental, and social health. Social health is a concept that has become increasingly important in scientific, policy, and executive circles. Social health emphasizes aspects of health related to a person's relationship with other people or the communities in which he lives. One of the factors affecting social health is quality of life. Quality of life is a multidimensional concept affected by many important factors such as physical and mental conditions. Assessing the quality of life is important in order to determine physical, mental, and social performance. These dimensions can be discussed independently, but there is a correlation between them. Certainly, the development of health promotion programs in the community, regardless of the social and cultural context of the community in question leads to inefficient solutions. Despite the importance of health workers' work, their high volume of work, and pathological consequences, few studies are conducted on the qualitative and social fields of health workers. As a result, it is necessary to pay attention to their physical, mental, and social health and quality of life. Achieving goals in the field of health requires preventing death, reducing disability, improving the quality of life, and efficient workforce. Since health workers are at the forefront of health care centers, it is necessary to have good social health and quality of life to provide services to villagers. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the social health and quality of life in health workers in Qorveh and Dehgolan in 2019. Materials & Methods: This study was conducted to evaluate the social health and quality of life of health workers in Qorveh and Dehgolan cities affiliated to Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and included 198 health workers findings of the present study showed that most of the health workers participating in this study were their average was 37 the majority were married, a diploma degree. Most of assessed their as total lowest mean The total their of life. of life the the of physical function of the in the of general health an average of physical health health The only variable statistically significant social of health workers (p = 0.005). Tukey's multiple comparison showed that the average score of social health obtained for health workers with a private home was significantly higher than those with a rental house (p = 0.005), and the difference was not significant in other cases. But all demographic variables of health workers had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life. The results showed that the quality of life in male health workers compared to the females (p = 0.012), health workers with diploma degree compared to health workers with secondary education (p <0.001), single health workers compared to married ones (p <0.001), and health workers who had no history of higher (p <0.001). variable that had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life (p <0.001). Quality of life in health workers with formal significantly lower health workers at other levels. Quality of life in health workers with more than 20 years of experience was significantly lower than health workers with 10 - 19 years of experience (p <0.001) and also less than 10 years of experience (p <0.001). The quality of life in health workers with poor economic status was significantly lower than those with average economic status (p = 0.04) and this difference was not significant at other levels. Housing status was another variable that had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life (p = 0.009). Also, the mean score of quality of life obtained for health workers with a private home was significantly higher than those with a rental house (p = 0.018) and in other cases this difference was not significant. Conclusion: The present study showed that the social health of health workers was average and higher than the mean score of 60. The highest and lowest scores obtained in the dimensions of social health were social cohesion and social acceptance, respectively. Also, the quality of life of health workers was moderate. Health workers obtained the highest score in the physical function dimension and the lowest score in the general health dimension. The mean score in the physical dimension was higher than the mental health dimension. The study on the effect of demographic variables showed that the only variable with a statistically significant relationship with social health was housing status and the difference was not significant for the other cases. All demographic variables of health workers had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life. Variables of quality of life and social health are dynamic concepts that change over time. Examining and measuring this concept depicts the status of human development in society, so continuous monitoring of quality of life and social health is essential. The health system will have the desired efficiency when the problems and needs of its employees are taken into account in its design and management. The results of this study highlight the importance of implementing health education and health promotion interventions in the field of social health and quality of life among employees.","PeriodicalId":159095,"journal":{"name":"Iran Journal of Nursing","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iran Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijn.33.128.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims: Health workers are the most fundamental elements of the health system whose mission is to improve the health of the rural community. Assessing and measuring the level of health is one of the important health issues. Health is a broad concept with multiple dimensions including physical, mental, and social health. Social health is a concept that has become increasingly important in scientific, policy, and executive circles. Social health emphasizes aspects of health related to a person's relationship with other people or the communities in which he lives. One of the factors affecting social health is quality of life. Quality of life is a multidimensional concept affected by many important factors such as physical and mental conditions. Assessing the quality of life is important in order to determine physical, mental, and social performance. These dimensions can be discussed independently, but there is a correlation between them. Certainly, the development of health promotion programs in the community, regardless of the social and cultural context of the community in question leads to inefficient solutions. Despite the importance of health workers' work, their high volume of work, and pathological consequences, few studies are conducted on the qualitative and social fields of health workers. As a result, it is necessary to pay attention to their physical, mental, and social health and quality of life. Achieving goals in the field of health requires preventing death, reducing disability, improving the quality of life, and efficient workforce. Since health workers are at the forefront of health care centers, it is necessary to have good social health and quality of life to provide services to villagers. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the social health and quality of life in health workers in Qorveh and Dehgolan in 2019. Materials & Methods: This study was conducted to evaluate the social health and quality of life of health workers in Qorveh and Dehgolan cities affiliated to Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and included 198 health workers findings of the present study showed that most of the health workers participating in this study were their average was 37 the majority were married, a diploma degree. Most of assessed their as total lowest mean The total their of life. of life the the of physical function of the in the of general health an average of physical health health The only variable statistically significant social of health workers (p = 0.005). Tukey's multiple comparison showed that the average score of social health obtained for health workers with a private home was significantly higher than those with a rental house (p = 0.005), and the difference was not significant in other cases. But all demographic variables of health workers had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life. The results showed that the quality of life in male health workers compared to the females (p = 0.012), health workers with diploma degree compared to health workers with secondary education (p <0.001), single health workers compared to married ones (p <0.001), and health workers who had no history of higher (p <0.001). variable that had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life (p <0.001). Quality of life in health workers with formal significantly lower health workers at other levels. Quality of life in health workers with more than 20 years of experience was significantly lower than health workers with 10 - 19 years of experience (p <0.001) and also less than 10 years of experience (p <0.001). The quality of life in health workers with poor economic status was significantly lower than those with average economic status (p = 0.04) and this difference was not significant at other levels. Housing status was another variable that had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life (p = 0.009). Also, the mean score of quality of life obtained for health workers with a private home was significantly higher than those with a rental house (p = 0.018) and in other cases this difference was not significant. Conclusion: The present study showed that the social health of health workers was average and higher than the mean score of 60. The highest and lowest scores obtained in the dimensions of social health were social cohesion and social acceptance, respectively. Also, the quality of life of health workers was moderate. Health workers obtained the highest score in the physical function dimension and the lowest score in the general health dimension. The mean score in the physical dimension was higher than the mental health dimension. The study on the effect of demographic variables showed that the only variable with a statistically significant relationship with social health was housing status and the difference was not significant for the other cases. All demographic variables of health workers had a statistically significant relationship with quality of life. Variables of quality of life and social health are dynamic concepts that change over time. Examining and measuring this concept depicts the status of human development in society, so continuous monitoring of quality of life and social health is essential. The health system will have the desired efficiency when the problems and needs of its employees are taken into account in its design and management. The results of this study highlight the importance of implementing health education and health promotion interventions in the field of social health and quality of life among employees.
2019年Qorveh和Dehgolan卫生工作者的社会健康和生活质量
背景与目的:卫生工作者是卫生系统中最基本的组成部分,其使命是改善农村社区的健康。健康水平的评估和测量是重要的健康问题之一。健康是一个广泛的概念,包括身体健康、心理健康和社会健康。社会健康是一个在科学、政策和行政领域日益重要的概念。社会健康强调与一个人与其他人或他所生活的社区的关系有关的健康方面。影响社会健康的因素之一是生活质量。生活质量是一个多维度的概念,受身体和精神状况等许多重要因素的影响。为了确定身体、心理和社会表现,评估生活质量很重要。这些维度可以独立讨论,但它们之间存在相关性。当然,在社区中发展健康促进计划,而不考虑社区的社会和文化背景,会导致低效的解决方案。尽管卫生工作者的工作很重要,工作量很大,而且有病理后果,但很少有关于卫生工作者的质量和社会领域的研究。因此,有必要关注他们的身体、心理、社会健康和生活质量。实现卫生领域的目标需要预防死亡、减少残疾、提高生活质量和高效的劳动力队伍。由于卫生工作者处于保健中心的最前线,因此必须具有良好的社会健康和生活质量才能为村民提供服务。因此,本研究旨在确定2019年Qorveh和Dehgolan卫生工作者的社会健康和生活质量。材料与方法:本研究对库尔德斯坦医学大学附属库尔韦赫市和德戈兰市卫生工作者的社会健康和生活质量进行了评估。这是一项描述性横断面研究,包括198名卫生工作者,本研究的结果表明,参与本研究的大多数卫生工作者平均年龄为37岁,大多数已婚,大专以上学历。大多数人认为他们的总平均寿命最低。总体健康状况、身体健康状况的平均值、健康状况是卫生工作者的唯一具有统计学意义的变量(p = 0.005)。Tukey的多重比较表明,拥有私人住房的卫生工作者的社会健康平均得分显著高于拥有租赁住房的卫生工作者(p = 0.005),其他情况下差异不显著。但卫生工作者的所有人口统计变量与生活质量有统计学意义的关系。结果表明,男性卫生工作者的生活质量与女性相比(p = 0.012),具有大专学历的卫生工作者与具有中等教育程度的卫生工作者相比(p <0.001),单身卫生工作者与已婚卫生工作者相比(p <0.001),以及没有更高学历的卫生工作者的生活质量(p <0.001)。与生活质量有统计学显著关系的变量(p <0.001)。卫生工作者的生活质量明显低于正规卫生工作者的其他水平。具有20年以上经验的卫生工作者的生活质量显著低于具有10 - 19年经验的卫生工作者(p <0.001),也低于10年经验的卫生工作者(p <0.001)。经济状况较差的卫生工作者的生活质量显著低于经济状况一般的卫生工作者(p = 0.04),其他水平间差异不显著。住房状况是与生活质量有统计学显著关系的另一个变量(p = 0.009)。此外,拥有私人住宅的卫生工作者获得的生活质量平均得分显著高于拥有租赁房屋的卫生工作者(p = 0.018),在其他情况下,这种差异并不显著。结论:本研究表明,卫生工作者的社会健康处于中等水平,高于60分的平均值。在社会健康维度中得分最高和最低的分别是社会凝聚力和社会接受度。此外,卫生工作者的生活质量一般。卫生工作者在身体机能维度上得分最高,在一般健康维度上得分最低。身体健康维度的平均得分高于心理健康维度。人口统计学变量的影响研究表明,与社会健康有统计学显著关系的唯一变量是住房状况,其他情况的差异不显著。 卫生工作者的所有人口统计变量与生活质量有统计学意义的关系。生活质量和社会健康的变量是随时间变化的动态概念。审查和衡量这一概念反映了人类在社会中的发展状况,因此对生活质量和社会健康的持续监测至关重要。当在设计和管理中考虑到员工的问题和需求时,卫生系统将具有预期的效率。本研究结果强调了在员工的社会健康和生活质量领域实施健康教育和健康促进干预措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信