AKAD GADAI TANAH PADA MASYARAKAT DESA CANDI KAB. SUMENEP DITINJAU DARI PRESPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM

Akhyar
{"title":"AKAD GADAI TANAH PADA MASYARAKAT DESA CANDI KAB. SUMENEP DITINJAU DARI PRESPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM","authors":"Akhyar","doi":"10.56874/islamiccircle.v1i1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \n  \nIn everyday life there are several forms of land pawning / rice fields that are often carried out by our society. As was done by the people of Candi Village, Dungkek. Regency of Sumenep when  wanted to pawn their land / rice fields because of economic problems. However, for whatever the reason, very application of muamalah activities held should not contrary with Islamic law. The purpose of this study is to find out how the pawn system is usually done by people of Candi, Dungkek, Regency of Sumenep is viewed by the perspective of Islamic law. This research uses descriptive qualitative method of analysis. The results of this study are the practice of  the pawn  that occured  in Candi Village can be described as that  A as a person who wants to provide land came to the B with the intention to borrow money. In the transaction, A gives land (paddy / garden) as collateral for the debt. However, the agreement did not determined who would manage the land. Although in reality the person who managed the land is B, besides B is entitled to take all the benefits resulted from the collateral land, there is also no provision between the two parties about the time period of the pawn, so the pawn recipient will return the pawn land until the owner paying the debt off. Viewed from the perspective of Islamic law, the land pawn contract carried out by the people of Candi Village, Dungkek Sub district, regency of Sumenep, in the terms of the availability of pillars and pawning conditions, is valid in accordance with the provisions of Islamic law, although it still needs improvement, especially clarity in the management and safe keeping of collateral items (marhun). because there is indication of  over-exploitation by Murtahin and there is not the clarity of the time of  the Pawn, and this resulted in losses to the Rahin.","PeriodicalId":143943,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Circle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Circle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56874/islamiccircle.v1i1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract   In everyday life there are several forms of land pawning / rice fields that are often carried out by our society. As was done by the people of Candi Village, Dungkek. Regency of Sumenep when  wanted to pawn their land / rice fields because of economic problems. However, for whatever the reason, very application of muamalah activities held should not contrary with Islamic law. The purpose of this study is to find out how the pawn system is usually done by people of Candi, Dungkek, Regency of Sumenep is viewed by the perspective of Islamic law. This research uses descriptive qualitative method of analysis. The results of this study are the practice of  the pawn  that occured  in Candi Village can be described as that  A as a person who wants to provide land came to the B with the intention to borrow money. In the transaction, A gives land (paddy / garden) as collateral for the debt. However, the agreement did not determined who would manage the land. Although in reality the person who managed the land is B, besides B is entitled to take all the benefits resulted from the collateral land, there is also no provision between the two parties about the time period of the pawn, so the pawn recipient will return the pawn land until the owner paying the debt off. Viewed from the perspective of Islamic law, the land pawn contract carried out by the people of Candi Village, Dungkek Sub district, regency of Sumenep, in the terms of the availability of pillars and pawning conditions, is valid in accordance with the provisions of Islamic law, although it still needs improvement, especially clarity in the management and safe keeping of collateral items (marhun). because there is indication of  over-exploitation by Murtahin and there is not the clarity of the time of  the Pawn, and this resulted in losses to the Rahin.
阿卡德当铺给社区寺庙KAB村的土地。SUMENEP从伊斯兰法律的角度来看
摘要在日常生活中,土地典当/稻田典当的形式多种多样,是社会中经常发生的现象。就像敦克克坎迪村的人们所做的那样。苏梅内普的摄政王因为经济问题想要典当他们的土地/稻田。然而,无论出于何种原因,muamalah活动的实施都不应违反伊斯兰法律。本研究的目的是了解坎迪人、敦刻克人、苏梅内普摄政人在伊斯兰教法的视角下,典当制度是如何运作的。本研究采用描述性定性分析方法。本研究的结果是发生在坎地村的典当实践,可以描述为A作为一个想要提供土地的人来到B的意图是借钱。在交易中,A将土地(稻田/花园)作为债务的抵押品。然而,该协议没有确定谁将管理这片土地。虽然在现实中土地的管理者是B,但除了B有权获得抵押土地所产生的所有利益外,双方也没有约定典当的期限,所以典当方将归还典当土地,直到所有者还清债务为止。从伊斯兰教法的角度来看,苏梅内普摄政王敦克街道坎迪村人民所签订的土地典当合同,在柱子的可得性和典当条件方面,按照伊斯兰教法的规定是有效的,但还需要改进,特别是在抵押物品的管理和安全保管方面(marhun)的明确。因为有迹象表明穆尔塔欣过度开采,而且Pawn的时间也不清楚,这导致了Rahin的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信