Characterising the Gap Between Theory and Practice of Ontology Reuse

Reham Alharbi, V. Tamma, F. Grasso
{"title":"Characterising the Gap Between Theory and Practice of Ontology Reuse","authors":"Reham Alharbi, V. Tamma, F. Grasso","doi":"10.1145/3460210.3493568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ontology reuse is a complex process that requires the support of methodologies and tools to minimise errors and to keep the ontologies consistent and coherent. Although the vast majority of ontology engineering methodologies include a reuse phase, and reuse has been investigated for different tasks and purposes (e.g.ontology integration), this body of work does not seem to translate into practice, neither in the form of strict criteria for reuse, nor as a set of community proposed guidelines. In this paper, we report the salient results from a study aimed at ontology developers and practitioners, whose objective is to gain an insight into the gap between the theory and the practice of ontology reuse. Thefocus of our study is to gain practitioners' views on i) their preferred reuse approaches; ii) the types of ontologies they tend to reuse (e.g. specific domain ontologies or upper-level ontologies)iii) what reporting information they deem useful when deciding which ontology to reuse; iv) what are the main reasons deterring them from reusing an ontology. Our findings confirm and extend established results from the literature, but in addition, the study provides a fresh view on the practice of reuse with an explicit focus on highly experienced developers and moderately experienced ones. The study corroborates the need for a comprehensive set of recommendations, that are widely accepted by the community, and are possibly implemented in development tools.","PeriodicalId":377331,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th on Knowledge Capture Conference","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th on Knowledge Capture Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3460210.3493568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Ontology reuse is a complex process that requires the support of methodologies and tools to minimise errors and to keep the ontologies consistent and coherent. Although the vast majority of ontology engineering methodologies include a reuse phase, and reuse has been investigated for different tasks and purposes (e.g.ontology integration), this body of work does not seem to translate into practice, neither in the form of strict criteria for reuse, nor as a set of community proposed guidelines. In this paper, we report the salient results from a study aimed at ontology developers and practitioners, whose objective is to gain an insight into the gap between the theory and the practice of ontology reuse. Thefocus of our study is to gain practitioners' views on i) their preferred reuse approaches; ii) the types of ontologies they tend to reuse (e.g. specific domain ontologies or upper-level ontologies)iii) what reporting information they deem useful when deciding which ontology to reuse; iv) what are the main reasons deterring them from reusing an ontology. Our findings confirm and extend established results from the literature, but in addition, the study provides a fresh view on the practice of reuse with an explicit focus on highly experienced developers and moderately experienced ones. The study corroborates the need for a comprehensive set of recommendations, that are widely accepted by the community, and are possibly implemented in development tools.
本体重用的理论与实践差距表征
本体重用是一个复杂的过程,需要方法和工具的支持,以尽量减少错误,并保持本体的一致性和一致性。尽管绝大多数本体工程方法都包括重用阶段,并且已经针对不同的任务和目的(例如本体集成)对重用进行了研究,但这些工作似乎并没有转化为实践,既没有以严格的重用标准的形式出现,也没有作为一组社区提出的指导方针。在本文中,我们报告了一项针对本体开发人员和实践者的研究的显著结果,该研究的目的是深入了解本体重用的理论与实践之间的差距。我们研究的重点是获得实践者的观点:1)他们首选的重用方法;Ii)他们倾向于重用的本体类型(例如特定领域本体或上层本体)iii)在决定重用哪个本体时,他们认为哪些报告信息有用;Iv)阻止他们重用本体的主要原因是什么。我们的发现证实并扩展了文献中已建立的结果,但除此之外,该研究提供了关于重用实践的新观点,明确地关注有经验的开发人员和有经验的开发人员。该研究证实需要一套全面的建议,这些建议被社区广泛接受,并可能在开发工具中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信