The Heritage of Eurocommunism in the Contemporary Radical Left

F. Escalona
{"title":"The Heritage of Eurocommunism in the Contemporary Radical Left","authors":"F. Escalona","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt1bpmbn2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though the European radical left has not generally been of interest to mainstream political observers, it has nonetheless recently become the subject of significant media coverage. Such presentations have often fallen into two symmetrical pitfalls. On the one hand, left parties have sometimes been presented as completely new, with their historical development left unexamined. On the other hand, many editorialists and even academics have paid little attention to what is original about these organizations: some have seen them as a disagreeable avatar of the far left, others as a resurgent ‘traditional’ (and thus inoffensive) social democracy. In fact, the parties which have realized the most remarkable electoral gains certainly belong to a ‘new’ radical left, though their theoretical orientations and the strategic challenges they face find an echo in a historical sequence which is today largely forgotten: that of Eurocommunism. Despite important differences in political and economic conditions today, several strategic debates from the Eurocommunist period are still relevant. They concern the capacity of the radical left to escape both marginality and normalization; in other words, to approach power without its desires for transformation being absorbed or liquidated by existing institutions. In fact, the Eurocommunist legacy is rich with inspiration (the search for a middle way between social democracy and the far left) and potential assets (in defining a strategy adapted to current European societies and the multiplicity of dominations which run through them), but also with unresolved problems (concerning in particular the relationship to the capitalist state).","PeriodicalId":364251,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Register","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Register","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1bpmbn2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Though the European radical left has not generally been of interest to mainstream political observers, it has nonetheless recently become the subject of significant media coverage. Such presentations have often fallen into two symmetrical pitfalls. On the one hand, left parties have sometimes been presented as completely new, with their historical development left unexamined. On the other hand, many editorialists and even academics have paid little attention to what is original about these organizations: some have seen them as a disagreeable avatar of the far left, others as a resurgent ‘traditional’ (and thus inoffensive) social democracy. In fact, the parties which have realized the most remarkable electoral gains certainly belong to a ‘new’ radical left, though their theoretical orientations and the strategic challenges they face find an echo in a historical sequence which is today largely forgotten: that of Eurocommunism. Despite important differences in political and economic conditions today, several strategic debates from the Eurocommunist period are still relevant. They concern the capacity of the radical left to escape both marginality and normalization; in other words, to approach power without its desires for transformation being absorbed or liquidated by existing institutions. In fact, the Eurocommunist legacy is rich with inspiration (the search for a middle way between social democracy and the far left) and potential assets (in defining a strategy adapted to current European societies and the multiplicity of dominations which run through them), but also with unresolved problems (concerning in particular the relationship to the capitalist state).
当代激进左翼的欧洲共产主义遗产
尽管主流政治观察家通常对欧洲激进左翼并不感兴趣,但它最近却成为了媒体大量报道的主题。这样的演讲常常陷入两个对称的陷阱。一方面,左翼政党有时被认为是全新的,它们的历史发展没有经过审查。另一方面,许多社论家甚至学者都很少关注这些组织的原创性:一些人将它们视为极左派的令人讨厌的化身,另一些人将其视为复兴的“传统”(因此是无害的)社会民主主义。事实上,那些在选举中获得最显著胜利的政党当然属于“新”激进左翼,尽管他们的理论取向和他们面临的战略挑战在今天基本上被遗忘的历史序列中找到了回声:欧洲共产主义。尽管今天的政治和经济条件存在重大差异,但欧洲共产主义时期的一些战略辩论仍然具有现实意义。它们涉及激进左派逃避边缘化和正常化的能力;换句话说,在接近权力的时候,它的变革欲望不会被现有机构吸收或清算。事实上,欧洲共产主义的遗产充满了灵感(在社会民主主义和极左派之间寻找一条中间道路)和潜在的资产(定义适应当前欧洲社会和贯穿其中的多种统治的战略),但也有未解决的问题(特别是与资本主义国家的关系)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信