Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective

C. Frauenberger
{"title":"Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective","authors":"C. Frauenberger","doi":"10.1145/2700648.2809851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assistive technology (AT) as a field explores the design, use and evaluation of computing technology that aims to benefit people with disabilities. The majority of the work consequently takes the functional needs of people with disabilities as starting point and matches those with technological opportunity spaces. With this paper, we argue that the underlying philosophical position implied in this approach can be seen as reductionist as the disabled experience is arguably richer and often more complex as can be projected from the functional limitations of people. Thinkers and activists in Disability Studies have conceptualised disability in various ways and more recently, critical realism was proposed as a philosophical position through which the many different facets of the disabled experience could be incorporated. In this paper, we explore the possibility of using a critical realist perspective to guide designers in developing technology for people with disabilities and thereby aim to contribute to the philosophical underpinnings of AT. After a brief review of historical conceptualisations of disability, we introduce the critical realist argument and discuss its appeal for understanding disability and the possible roles technology can have in this context. Subsequently, we aim to translate this philosophical and moral debate into a research agenda for AT and exemplify how it can be operationalised by presenting the OutsideTheBox project as a case study.","PeriodicalId":237212,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Assistive technology (AT) as a field explores the design, use and evaluation of computing technology that aims to benefit people with disabilities. The majority of the work consequently takes the functional needs of people with disabilities as starting point and matches those with technological opportunity spaces. With this paper, we argue that the underlying philosophical position implied in this approach can be seen as reductionist as the disabled experience is arguably richer and often more complex as can be projected from the functional limitations of people. Thinkers and activists in Disability Studies have conceptualised disability in various ways and more recently, critical realism was proposed as a philosophical position through which the many different facets of the disabled experience could be incorporated. In this paper, we explore the possibility of using a critical realist perspective to guide designers in developing technology for people with disabilities and thereby aim to contribute to the philosophical underpinnings of AT. After a brief review of historical conceptualisations of disability, we introduce the critical realist argument and discuss its appeal for understanding disability and the possible roles technology can have in this context. Subsequently, we aim to translate this philosophical and moral debate into a research agenda for AT and exemplify how it can be operationalised by presenting the OutsideTheBox project as a case study.
残疾与技术:一个批判现实主义的视角
辅助技术(AT)作为一个领域,探索旨在使残疾人受益的计算技术的设计、使用和评估。因此,大部分工作以残疾人的功能需求为出发点,并与技术机会空间相匹配。在这篇论文中,我们认为这种方法隐含的基本哲学立场可以被视为简化论者,因为残疾人的经历可以说是更丰富的,而且往往是更复杂的,可以从人们的功能限制中预测出来。残疾研究领域的思想家和活动家以各种方式将残疾概念化,最近,批判现实主义被提出作为一种哲学立场,通过这种立场,残疾经历的许多不同方面都可以被纳入其中。在本文中,我们探讨了使用批判现实主义视角来指导设计师为残疾人开发技术的可能性,从而旨在为AT的哲学基础做出贡献。在简要回顾了残疾的历史概念之后,我们介绍了批判现实主义的观点,并讨论了它对理解残疾的吸引力,以及技术在这一背景下可能扮演的角色。随后,我们的目标是将这种哲学和道德辩论转化为AT的研究议程,并通过将OutsideTheBox项目作为案例研究来举例说明如何将其付诸实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信