Multiple Dimensions of Accounting in the Development of GAAP

J. Staunton
{"title":"Multiple Dimensions of Accounting in the Development of GAAP","authors":"J. Staunton","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00251.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phrase ‘accepted accounting principles’ underlying financial statements is a forerunner of today's accounting standards. Here, it is argued that history shows that the term ‘principles’ is often most vague in debates on the development of those standards. The reasons for and consequences of that vague use are varied and complex. This article provides insights not highlighted in earlier analyses of the periods reviewed. While debates like the rule- versus principle-based standards are set up as two-dimensional, the many dimensions of accounting often allow argument to be easily diverted. The debate/argument thus remains unresolved. For progress to be achieved in the establishment of accounting standards the many dimensions of accounting must be acknowledged and attempts to divert debate minimized. Those with a stake in the development of accounting standards need to consider the total scene of the related accounting. In a particular debate, dimensions under scrutiny must be stated, with any others in that total scene being acknowledged even if kept constant.","PeriodicalId":134477,"journal":{"name":"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00251.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The phrase ‘accepted accounting principles’ underlying financial statements is a forerunner of today's accounting standards. Here, it is argued that history shows that the term ‘principles’ is often most vague in debates on the development of those standards. The reasons for and consequences of that vague use are varied and complex. This article provides insights not highlighted in earlier analyses of the periods reviewed. While debates like the rule- versus principle-based standards are set up as two-dimensional, the many dimensions of accounting often allow argument to be easily diverted. The debate/argument thus remains unresolved. For progress to be achieved in the establishment of accounting standards the many dimensions of accounting must be acknowledged and attempts to divert debate minimized. Those with a stake in the development of accounting standards need to consider the total scene of the related accounting. In a particular debate, dimensions under scrutiny must be stated, with any others in that total scene being acknowledged even if kept constant.
GAAP发展中的会计多维度
作为财务报表基础的“公认会计原则”是当今会计准则的前身。在这里,有人认为,历史表明,在关于这些标准的发展的辩论中,“原则”一词往往是最模糊的。的原因和后果,模糊的使用是多样的、复杂的。本文提供了之前对所回顾时期的分析中没有强调的见解。虽然诸如基于规则的标准与基于原则的标准的争论是二维的,但会计的许多维度往往使争论很容易被转移。因此,辩论/争论仍未解决。为了在制定会计准则方面取得进展,必须承认会计的许多方面,尽量减少转移争论的企图。那些与会计准则的制定有利害关系的人需要考虑相关会计的总体情况。在一场特定的辩论中,必须说明被审查的维度,即使保持不变,也要承认整个场景中的任何其他维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信