Information Retrieval Techniques for Automated Policy Review

Summer Chambers, Kaleb M Shikur, Stephen Morris
{"title":"Information Retrieval Techniques for Automated Policy Review","authors":"Summer Chambers, Kaleb M Shikur, Stephen Morris","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we adapt standard information retrieval techniques to a novel task, the mandatory regulatory review of public comments on proposed rule changes. The vast number of public comments exceeds the responsible agency’s ability to manually review in the time allowed. Therefore, the agency requires an automated approach to efficiently sort and process the comments. To rank the public comments’ relevance to rule sections, we implement a vector space model and compare the results to experts’ reviews. We perform experiments over several indexing techniques to improve semantic relevance, splitting the regulatory document based on textual formatting, text length, and a hybrid method combining these two techniques. To improve the accuracy of our predictions, we test various synonym lists generated from a domain-specific ontology, as well as variations of standard stopword lists. By applying the relevance search as a multi-class classification problem, we find the method that most closely matches human reviews, achieving respective normalized discounted cumulative gain and mean average precision scores of 0.83 and 0.75 on our test data set.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we adapt standard information retrieval techniques to a novel task, the mandatory regulatory review of public comments on proposed rule changes. The vast number of public comments exceeds the responsible agency’s ability to manually review in the time allowed. Therefore, the agency requires an automated approach to efficiently sort and process the comments. To rank the public comments’ relevance to rule sections, we implement a vector space model and compare the results to experts’ reviews. We perform experiments over several indexing techniques to improve semantic relevance, splitting the regulatory document based on textual formatting, text length, and a hybrid method combining these two techniques. To improve the accuracy of our predictions, we test various synonym lists generated from a domain-specific ontology, as well as variations of standard stopword lists. By applying the relevance search as a multi-class classification problem, we find the method that most closely matches human reviews, achieving respective normalized discounted cumulative gain and mean average precision scores of 0.83 and 0.75 on our test data set.
自动策略审查的信息检索技术
在本文中,我们将标准信息检索技术应用于一个新的任务,即对拟议规则变更的公众意见进行强制性监管审查。大量的公众意见超出了负责机构在允许的时间内手动审查的能力。因此,该机构需要一种自动化的方法来有效地分类和处理评论。为了对公众评论与规则部分的相关性进行排名,我们实现了一个向量空间模型,并将结果与专家的评论进行比较。我们在几种索引技术上进行了实验,以提高语义相关性,根据文本格式、文本长度和结合这两种技术的混合方法拆分规范性文档。为了提高预测的准确性,我们测试了从特定领域本体生成的各种同义词列表,以及标准停词列表的变体。通过将相关性搜索应用于多类分类问题,我们找到了最接近人类评论的方法,在我们的测试数据集上分别获得了0.83和0.75的归一化贴现累积增益和平均平均精度分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信