Fine-Grained Open Learner Models: Complexity Versus Support

Julio Daniel Guerra Hollstein, Jordan Barria-Pineda, C. Schunn, S. Bull, Peter Brusilovsky
{"title":"Fine-Grained Open Learner Models: Complexity Versus Support","authors":"Julio Daniel Guerra Hollstein, Jordan Barria-Pineda, C. Schunn, S. Bull, Peter Brusilovsky","doi":"10.1145/3079628.3079682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open Learner Models (OLM) show the learner model to users to assist their self-regulated learning by, for example, helping prompt reflection, facilitating planning and supporting navigation. OLMs can show different levels of detail of the underlying learner model, and can also structure the information differently. As a result, a trade-off may exist between the potential for better support for learning and the complexity of the information shown. This paper investigates students' perceptions about whether offering more and richer information in an OLM will result in more effective support for their self-regulated learning. In a first study, questionnaire responses relating to designs for six visualisations of varying complexity led to the implementation of three variations on one of the designs. A second controlled study involved students interacting with these variations. The study revealed that the most useful variation for searching for suitable learning material was a visualisation combining a basic coloured grid, an extended bar chart-like visualisation indicating related concepts, and a learning gauge.","PeriodicalId":216017,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3079628.3079682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Open Learner Models (OLM) show the learner model to users to assist their self-regulated learning by, for example, helping prompt reflection, facilitating planning and supporting navigation. OLMs can show different levels of detail of the underlying learner model, and can also structure the information differently. As a result, a trade-off may exist between the potential for better support for learning and the complexity of the information shown. This paper investigates students' perceptions about whether offering more and richer information in an OLM will result in more effective support for their self-regulated learning. In a first study, questionnaire responses relating to designs for six visualisations of varying complexity led to the implementation of three variations on one of the designs. A second controlled study involved students interacting with these variations. The study revealed that the most useful variation for searching for suitable learning material was a visualisation combining a basic coloured grid, an extended bar chart-like visualisation indicating related concepts, and a learning gauge.
细粒度开放学习者模型:复杂性与支持
开放学习者模型(Open Learner Models, OLM)向用户展示学习者模型,帮助他们进行自我调节的学习,例如,帮助促进反思、促进规划和支持导航。olm可以显示底层学习者模型的不同层次的细节,也可以以不同的方式构建信息。因此,在更好地支持学习的潜力和所显示信息的复杂性之间可能存在权衡。本文调查了学生对在学习管理中提供更多和更丰富的信息是否会对他们的自主学习提供更有效的支持的看法。在第一项研究中,与六个不同复杂性的可视化设计相关的问卷回答导致其中一个设计的三种变体的实施。第二项对照研究涉及学生与这些变化的互动。研究表明,搜索合适的学习材料最有用的变化是结合基本彩色网格的可视化,扩展条形图式的可视化显示相关概念,以及学习量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信