Head office attitudes towards inter-organisational learning in Irish non-governmental organisations

C. Forsyth, M. Maclachlan
{"title":"Head office attitudes towards inter-organisational learning in Irish non-governmental organisations","authors":"C. Forsyth, M. Maclachlan","doi":"10.1080/18716340902875860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Paris Declaration seeks to increase the effectiveness of international aid. Donor-to-donor cooperation is seen as a key element of this. Given that non-governmental organisations (NGOs) often play a mediating role between donors and recipients, the importance of NGOs harmonising their activities has also been realised. While the value of mechanisms to achieve organisational learning within NGOs is becoming increasingly appreciated, the dynamics involved in sharing organisational learning between NGOs, as a means of harmonising their activities, are poorly understood. Given the significant flows of both public and governmental funding through NGOs, it is important to ensure that NGOs are both accountable for it and able to share their learning with others. This study explores the attitudes of senior head office NGO staff in Ireland towards inter-organisational learning between NGOs working on health-related projects in Africa. The strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats associated with sharing organisational learning are explored through key informant interviews with representatives from 10 NGOs. Content analysis of the transcripts identifies a tension between positive and negative feelings about sharing organisational learning. These tensions include a recognition of the possible increased collaborative power and profile to influence government or raise funds, along with concerns over possible loss of identity; an anticipated increased knowledge of the sector, along with concern about the relatively weaker positioning of smaller NGOs; the desire to be open with others involved in similar work, along with the fear of initiatives being stolen and the consequences of disclosing poor outcomes; the value of a more structured way of relating to each other, along with a concern with being over-structured in their relations, or losing influence in collaborative efforts; and the desire to learn from others along with frustration that NGOs existing mechanisms and commitments to achieve organisational learning are insufficient. These tensions, while real, need not necessarily prohibit attempts to promote organisational learning between NGOs and, in so doing, contribute to increasing the effectiveness of international aid. The extension of the present analysis to collaborations facilitated through strategic alliances is recommended.","PeriodicalId":169185,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management for Development Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management for Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18716340902875860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Paris Declaration seeks to increase the effectiveness of international aid. Donor-to-donor cooperation is seen as a key element of this. Given that non-governmental organisations (NGOs) often play a mediating role between donors and recipients, the importance of NGOs harmonising their activities has also been realised. While the value of mechanisms to achieve organisational learning within NGOs is becoming increasingly appreciated, the dynamics involved in sharing organisational learning between NGOs, as a means of harmonising their activities, are poorly understood. Given the significant flows of both public and governmental funding through NGOs, it is important to ensure that NGOs are both accountable for it and able to share their learning with others. This study explores the attitudes of senior head office NGO staff in Ireland towards inter-organisational learning between NGOs working on health-related projects in Africa. The strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats associated with sharing organisational learning are explored through key informant interviews with representatives from 10 NGOs. Content analysis of the transcripts identifies a tension between positive and negative feelings about sharing organisational learning. These tensions include a recognition of the possible increased collaborative power and profile to influence government or raise funds, along with concerns over possible loss of identity; an anticipated increased knowledge of the sector, along with concern about the relatively weaker positioning of smaller NGOs; the desire to be open with others involved in similar work, along with the fear of initiatives being stolen and the consequences of disclosing poor outcomes; the value of a more structured way of relating to each other, along with a concern with being over-structured in their relations, or losing influence in collaborative efforts; and the desire to learn from others along with frustration that NGOs existing mechanisms and commitments to achieve organisational learning are insufficient. These tensions, while real, need not necessarily prohibit attempts to promote organisational learning between NGOs and, in so doing, contribute to increasing the effectiveness of international aid. The extension of the present analysis to collaborations facilitated through strategic alliances is recommended.
总部对爱尔兰非政府组织跨组织学习的态度
《巴黎宣言》旨在提高国际援助的有效性。捐助者与捐助者之间的合作被视为这方面的一个关键因素。鉴于非政府组织经常在捐助方和受援方之间发挥调解作用,人们也认识到非政府组织协调其活动的重要性。虽然在非政府组织内部实现组织学习的机制的价值越来越受到重视,但在非政府组织之间分享组织学习作为协调其活动的一种手段所涉及的动态却知之甚少。鉴于通过非政府组织获得的大量公共和政府资金,重要的是要确保非政府组织对其负责,并能够与他人分享他们的经验。本研究探讨了爱尔兰非政府组织总部高级工作人员对从事非洲健康相关项目的非政府组织之间组织间学习的态度。通过与10个非政府组织代表的重要线人访谈,探讨与分享组织学习相关的优势、劣势、机会和威胁。对成绩单的内容分析表明,在分享组织学习的积极情绪和消极情绪之间存在紧张关系。这些紧张关系包括认识到可能会增加合作力量和影响力,以影响政府或筹集资金,以及对可能失去身份的担忧;人们对这一领域的了解有所增加,同时对小型非政府组织相对较弱的地位感到担忧;希望与从事类似工作的其他人开诚布公,同时担心主动性被窃取,担心披露不良成果的后果;一种更加结构化的相互联系方式的价值,以及对关系过度结构化或在合作努力中失去影响力的担忧;以及向他人学习的愿望,以及对非政府组织现有机制和实现组织学习的承诺不足的失望。这些紧张关系虽然真实存在,但并不一定会阻碍促进非政府组织之间的组织学习,从而有助于提高国际援助的有效性。建议将本分析扩展到通过战略联盟促进的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信