Estimation of Correct Long-Seam Mismatch Using FEA to Compare the Measured Strain in a Non-Destructive Testing of a Pressurant Tank

C. Pany
{"title":"Estimation of Correct Long-Seam Mismatch Using FEA to Compare the Measured Strain in a Non-Destructive Testing of a Pressurant Tank","authors":"C. Pany","doi":"10.4018/ijsvst.2021010102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the design criterion of a pressurant steel tank made of HSLA 15CDV6 and proof pressure test (PPT) as a non-destructive examination. An inverse Ramberg-Osgood relation is used to represent the stress-strain curve of the material. Elasto-plastic finite element analysis (FEA) has been carried out to examine the adequacy of the design. Experimental stress analysis has been carried out from the measured strains and found maximum effective stress is at LS joint (max. measured strain location). Strain obtained from FEA is compared reasonably well with the proof pressure test (PPT) data at most of the strain gauge locations except at one long-seam (LS) joint. So, to explain the causes of difference in strains near one LS, parametric studies have been performed in a 3D FEA with varying LS mismatch to find the correct mismatch as a reverse engineering problem. It is found that a mismatch value of 0.9 mm will give the required strain at PPT, which is measured only 0.4 mm. The failure pressure estimated through nonlinear FEA/analytical expressions found to meet the design.","PeriodicalId":201037,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Smart Vehicles and Smart Transportation","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Smart Vehicles and Smart Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsvst.2021010102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses the design criterion of a pressurant steel tank made of HSLA 15CDV6 and proof pressure test (PPT) as a non-destructive examination. An inverse Ramberg-Osgood relation is used to represent the stress-strain curve of the material. Elasto-plastic finite element analysis (FEA) has been carried out to examine the adequacy of the design. Experimental stress analysis has been carried out from the measured strains and found maximum effective stress is at LS joint (max. measured strain location). Strain obtained from FEA is compared reasonably well with the proof pressure test (PPT) data at most of the strain gauge locations except at one long-seam (LS) joint. So, to explain the causes of difference in strains near one LS, parametric studies have been performed in a 3D FEA with varying LS mismatch to find the correct mismatch as a reverse engineering problem. It is found that a mismatch value of 0.9 mm will give the required strain at PPT, which is measured only 0.4 mm. The failure pressure estimated through nonlinear FEA/analytical expressions found to meet the design.
用有限元法比较压力罐无损检测中实测应变的正确长缝失配
本文讨论了HSLA 15CDV6型压力钢储罐的设计准则及无损检测的耐压试验(PPT)。采用Ramberg-Osgood逆关系表示材料的应力-应变曲线。进行了弹塑性有限元分析(FEA)来检验设计的充分性。根据实测应变进行了试验应力分析,发现最大有效应力在LS接头处(max。测量应变位置)。除了一个长缝接缝外,在大多数应变片位置,有限元分析得到的应变与证明压力试验(PPT)数据比较良好。因此,为了解释一个LS附近应变差异的原因,在具有不同LS错配的3D有限元中进行了参数研究,以找到正确的错配作为逆向工程问题。结果发现,在PPT处,0.9 mm的失配值将给出所需的应变,而PPT处的应变仅为0.4 mm。通过非线性有限元分析和解析表达式计算得到的破坏压力满足设计要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信