Film and authorship

V. Wexman
{"title":"Film and authorship","authors":"V. Wexman","doi":"10.7765/9781784997304.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 1960s, when cinema first entered the academy as a serious object of study, the primary focus was on \"auterism\", or on film's authorship. Burgeoning cinema studies courses demonstrated how directors were the authors of work that undermined (or succeeded in spite of) all the constraints that Hollywood threw at them. New critical methods were introduced as the field matured, and studies of the author/director, for the most part, were considered obsolete. The cSpanning fields from poststructuralism, feminism, queer theory, postcolonialism, and cultural studies, the contributors ask - what does \"auteurship\" look like today in light of these developments? ontent s are divided into three major sections: Theoretical Statements; Historical and Institutional Contexts; and Case Studies. Virginia Wright Wexman's comprehensive introduction contextualizes the selections and summarizes the scholarly approaches with which auteurism has been addressed in the past; it also provides a sketch of the history of media authorship.","PeriodicalId":125999,"journal":{"name":"Beginning film studies (second edition)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beginning film studies (second edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781784997304.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

During the 1960s, when cinema first entered the academy as a serious object of study, the primary focus was on "auterism", or on film's authorship. Burgeoning cinema studies courses demonstrated how directors were the authors of work that undermined (or succeeded in spite of) all the constraints that Hollywood threw at them. New critical methods were introduced as the field matured, and studies of the author/director, for the most part, were considered obsolete. The cSpanning fields from poststructuralism, feminism, queer theory, postcolonialism, and cultural studies, the contributors ask - what does "auteurship" look like today in light of these developments? ontent s are divided into three major sections: Theoretical Statements; Historical and Institutional Contexts; and Case Studies. Virginia Wright Wexman's comprehensive introduction contextualizes the selections and summarizes the scholarly approaches with which auteurism has been addressed in the past; it also provides a sketch of the history of media authorship.
电影和作者
在20世纪60年代,当电影第一次作为一个严肃的研究对象进入学院时,主要关注的是“auterism”,即电影的作者性。新兴的电影研究课程展示了导演们是如何创作作品的,这些作品破坏了(或尽管成功了)好莱坞施加给他们的所有限制。随着该领域的成熟,新的批评方法被引入,而对作者/导演的研究在很大程度上被认为是过时的。横跨后结构主义、女权主义、酷儿理论、后殖民主义和文化研究等领域,作者提出了一个问题:在这些发展的背景下,“导演”在今天是什么样子?内容分为三个主要部分:理论陈述;历史和制度背景;案例研究。维吉尼亚·赖特·韦克斯曼(Virginia Wright Wexman)的全面介绍将这些选择置于背景中,并总结了过去研究导演主义的学术方法;它还提供了媒体作者的历史概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信