Antecedents and Effects of Online Third-Party Information on Offline Impressions: A Test of Warranting Theory

Brianna L. Lane, Ioana A. Cionea, Norah E. Dunbar, C. Carr
{"title":"Antecedents and Effects of Online Third-Party Information on Offline Impressions: A Test of Warranting Theory","authors":"Brianna L. Lane, Ioana A. Cionea, Norah E. Dunbar, C. Carr","doi":"10.1027/1864-1105/a000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Warranting theory articulates the process by which individuals connect online information to an offline target, guiding impression formation. The presence of online information alone may not innately guide impression formation about a target. Rather, the connection of that claim to perceptions of a target’s offline self should be driven by several antecedents. The reported experiment tested the antecedent factors of third-party claims with respect to perceptions and behavioral intentions toward a course instructor. Undergraduate students in the United States ( N = 209) viewed a hypothetical professor-rating website reflecting a 2 (target reply: present or absent) × 2 (rater identifiability: identifiable or anonymous) × 2 (number of ratings: many or few) × 2 (average rating: present or absent) experimental design, and reported the characteristics they perceived the target professor to possess offline. Results of a structural equation model revealed only an individual’s ability to reply to online information influenced judgments of warranting value; but the warranting value of the online information influenced subsequent impressions of the target’s offline attributes.","PeriodicalId":366104,"journal":{"name":"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Warranting theory articulates the process by which individuals connect online information to an offline target, guiding impression formation. The presence of online information alone may not innately guide impression formation about a target. Rather, the connection of that claim to perceptions of a target’s offline self should be driven by several antecedents. The reported experiment tested the antecedent factors of third-party claims with respect to perceptions and behavioral intentions toward a course instructor. Undergraduate students in the United States ( N = 209) viewed a hypothetical professor-rating website reflecting a 2 (target reply: present or absent) × 2 (rater identifiability: identifiable or anonymous) × 2 (number of ratings: many or few) × 2 (average rating: present or absent) experimental design, and reported the characteristics they perceived the target professor to possess offline. Results of a structural equation model revealed only an individual’s ability to reply to online information influenced judgments of warranting value; but the warranting value of the online information influenced subsequent impressions of the target’s offline attributes.
在线第三方信息对线下印象的前因与影响:担保理论的检验
摘要担保理论阐明了个人将在线信息与离线目标联系起来,指导印象形成的过程。在线信息本身可能不会天生引导对目标的印象形成。相反,这种说法与目标线下自我的感知之间的联系应该是由几个先决条件驱动的。报告的实验测试了第三方索赔的先行因素,涉及对课程教师的感知和行为意图。美国的本科生(N = 209)浏览了一个假设的教授评分网站,该网站反映了2(目标回复:出席或缺席)x2(评分者可识别性:可识别或匿名)x2(评分数量:多或少)x2(平均评分:出席或缺席)的实验设计,并报告了他们认为目标教授具有的特征。结构方程模型的结果显示,只有个人回复网络信息的能力影响保证价值的判断;但在线信息的担保价值影响了对目标离线属性的后续印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信