Efficacy of antibacterial sealant to prevent microlekage at the implant superstructure interface – An in vivo study

A. Nayak, R. Nadiger, K. Bhat, P. Ingalgi, Raghvendra Kulkarni
{"title":"Efficacy of antibacterial sealant to prevent microlekage at the implant superstructure interface – An in vivo study","authors":"A. Nayak, R. Nadiger, K. Bhat, P. Ingalgi, Raghvendra Kulkarni","doi":"10.4103/ijmo.ijmo_18_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibacterial sealants to prevent microleakage at the implant superstructure interface. Materials and Methods: Around twenty patients were selected after a thorough investigation with lower missing teeth (1st and 2nd premolars 1st and 2nd molars) by inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups Group A (10 patients)– Control group and Group B (10 patients)-test group. The implants were placed with proper surgical protocol in all the patients except that in the test group antibacterial sealant was used before putting the coverscrew. The implants were allowed to osseointegrate for 3 months after which swabs were collected from the interior of the implant once the cover screw was removed. The swabs collected from all the patients were immediately transported to the microbiology laboratory by placing in 1 ml of phosphate buffered saline. The swabs were inoculated on brain heart infusion and McKonkeys medium and processed for routine culture and sensitivity. The identification of the isolates was done by standard microbiological methods. The data thus obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using t-tests for equality. Results: Microbial growth was found in both the groups, but lesser variation in colony-forming units was observed in the test group where antibacterial sealant was used. Conclusions: It was concluded that in spite of using antibacterial sealants; some amount of microleakage was still observed.","PeriodicalId":360415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Oral Research","volume":"745 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmo.ijmo_18_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibacterial sealants to prevent microleakage at the implant superstructure interface. Materials and Methods: Around twenty patients were selected after a thorough investigation with lower missing teeth (1st and 2nd premolars 1st and 2nd molars) by inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups Group A (10 patients)– Control group and Group B (10 patients)-test group. The implants were placed with proper surgical protocol in all the patients except that in the test group antibacterial sealant was used before putting the coverscrew. The implants were allowed to osseointegrate for 3 months after which swabs were collected from the interior of the implant once the cover screw was removed. The swabs collected from all the patients were immediately transported to the microbiology laboratory by placing in 1 ml of phosphate buffered saline. The swabs were inoculated on brain heart infusion and McKonkeys medium and processed for routine culture and sensitivity. The identification of the isolates was done by standard microbiological methods. The data thus obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using t-tests for equality. Results: Microbial growth was found in both the groups, but lesser variation in colony-forming units was observed in the test group where antibacterial sealant was used. Conclusions: It was concluded that in spite of using antibacterial sealants; some amount of microleakage was still observed.
抗菌密封胶防止种植体上部结构界面微渗漏的体内研究
目的:评价抗菌密封剂对种植体上部结构界面微渗漏的预防效果。材料与方法:选取20例经过全面调查的下颌缺失牙(第一、第二前磨牙、第一、第二磨牙)患者,按纳入标准进行研究。将患者分为两组:A组(10例)-对照组和B组(10例)-试验组。除试验组在盖盖前使用抗菌密封剂外,其余患者均按手术方案放置种植体。种植体骨整合3个月后,一旦拆除盖螺钉,从种植体内部收集拭子。从所有患者身上收集的拭子立即放入1ml磷酸盐缓冲盐水中运送到微生物实验室。拭子接种于脑心输注和McKonkeys培养基上,进行常规培养和敏感性处理。采用标准微生物学方法对分离物进行鉴定。由此获得的数据使用t检验进行统计分析。结果:两组均有微生物生长,但在使用抗菌密封胶的实验组中,菌落形成单位的变化较小。结论:尽管使用了抗菌密封剂;仍观察到一定程度的微泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信