The Effects of Financial and Operational Hedging on Company Value: The Case of Malaysian Multinationals

Azadeh Hadian, Cahit Adaoglu
{"title":"The Effects of Financial and Operational Hedging on Company Value: The Case of Malaysian Multinationals","authors":"Azadeh Hadian, Cahit Adaoglu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3724984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the value effects of financial and operational hedging in a managed floating exchange rate regime with strict limitations on the trading of Malaysian Ringgit for a sample of 109 Malaysian multinationals from 2004–2018. Using Tobin’s Q as a proxy for company value, the two-step system GMM estimation results show that, on average, derivatives hedging creates a value premium range of 7.88–8.21 % in the short-run, and 18.81–19.80 % in the long-run. This value premium emerged both after controlling for non-operational foreign exchange profits (losses), and its two components: transaction and translation profits (losses). In contrast, foreign debt hedging, on average, creates a value discount range of 8.19–8.54 % in the short-run and 12.70–13.12 % in the long-run. No evidence shows value effect for operational hedging though. The positive value effect of derivatives hedging should motivate managers of Malaysian multinationals to hedge foreign currency exposure through derivatives and encourage policymakers to take steps in developing derivatives market and products. However, the negative value effect of foreign debt hedging indicates that it destroys value. This negative effect might reflect two potential causes; higher company risk due to FC debt financing, and improper hedging practices including high costs of hedging in the underdeveloped derivatives market. These potential causes need further empirical evaluations.","PeriodicalId":293888,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the value effects of financial and operational hedging in a managed floating exchange rate regime with strict limitations on the trading of Malaysian Ringgit for a sample of 109 Malaysian multinationals from 2004–2018. Using Tobin’s Q as a proxy for company value, the two-step system GMM estimation results show that, on average, derivatives hedging creates a value premium range of 7.88–8.21 % in the short-run, and 18.81–19.80 % in the long-run. This value premium emerged both after controlling for non-operational foreign exchange profits (losses), and its two components: transaction and translation profits (losses). In contrast, foreign debt hedging, on average, creates a value discount range of 8.19–8.54 % in the short-run and 12.70–13.12 % in the long-run. No evidence shows value effect for operational hedging though. The positive value effect of derivatives hedging should motivate managers of Malaysian multinationals to hedge foreign currency exposure through derivatives and encourage policymakers to take steps in developing derivatives market and products. However, the negative value effect of foreign debt hedging indicates that it destroys value. This negative effect might reflect two potential causes; higher company risk due to FC debt financing, and improper hedging practices including high costs of hedging in the underdeveloped derivatives market. These potential causes need further empirical evaluations.
财务和经营套期保值对公司价值的影响:以马来西亚跨国公司为例
摘要本研究以2004-2018年109家马来西亚跨国公司为样本,考察了在严格限制马来西亚林吉特交易的有管理浮动汇率制度下,金融和业务对冲的价值效应。使用Tobin’s Q作为公司价值的代理,两步系统GMM估计结果表明,衍生品套期保值平均在短期内创造了7.88 - 8.21%的价值溢价,在长期内创造了18.81 - 19.80%的价值溢价。在控制了非经营性外汇利润(损失)及其两个组成部分:交易利润和折算利润(损失)之后,这种价值溢价出现了。相比之下,外债对冲平均在短期内创造8.19 - 8.54%的价值折扣范围,在长期内创造12.70 - 13.12%的价值折扣范围。但没有证据表明经营性套期保值存在价值效应。衍生品套期保值的积极价值效应应该激励马来西亚跨国公司的管理人员通过衍生品对冲外汇风险,并鼓励政策制定者采取措施发展衍生品市场和产品。然而,外债套期保值的负价值效应表明它破坏了价值。这种负面影响可能反映了两个潜在的原因;由于FC债务融资导致的公司风险增加,以及不适当的套期保值做法,包括在不发达的衍生品市场中套期保值成本高。这些潜在的原因需要进一步的实证评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信