Thermodynamic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery Systems in Large Waste Heat Generating Industries

Shantanu Thada, Yash T. Rajan, A. Pradeep, A. Sridharan
{"title":"Thermodynamic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery Systems in Large Waste Heat Generating Industries","authors":"Shantanu Thada, Yash T. Rajan, A. Pradeep, A. Sridharan","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-59194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The accelerating growth of electricity demand necessitates looking for potential waste heat recovery solutions in production industries. Significant potential for efficient waste heat recovery is observed in the cement manufacturing industry. Based on the waste heat source temperatures in a cement plant, two potential candidates, the supercritical CO2 Brayton (S-CO2) cycle or the Organic Rankine cycle (ORC), promises low capital cost and enhanced thermodynamic performance. The current study focuses on modelling and optimization of the S-CO2 and ORC cycles for a 1 MTPA cement plant, with the raw-clinker preheater as the waste-heat source. The primary objective is to maximize the net-power output using genetic algorithms. A comparative performance analysis of the two ORCs with working fluids: R134a and Propane, the simply recuperated S-CO2 cycle (RC) and recompressed-recuperated S-CO2 cycle (RRC) configurations is presented with varying number of preheaters. For all cases, ORC-R134a yields more power than the ORC-Propane, RC, and RRC configurations. In terms of the waste heat recovered, ORC-Propane marginally outperforms ORC-R134a. The ORC configurations recover 32%–38% of the available heat, while the S-CO2 configurations recover, at maximum, 25%–30% of the available heat.","PeriodicalId":169840,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-59194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accelerating growth of electricity demand necessitates looking for potential waste heat recovery solutions in production industries. Significant potential for efficient waste heat recovery is observed in the cement manufacturing industry. Based on the waste heat source temperatures in a cement plant, two potential candidates, the supercritical CO2 Brayton (S-CO2) cycle or the Organic Rankine cycle (ORC), promises low capital cost and enhanced thermodynamic performance. The current study focuses on modelling and optimization of the S-CO2 and ORC cycles for a 1 MTPA cement plant, with the raw-clinker preheater as the waste-heat source. The primary objective is to maximize the net-power output using genetic algorithms. A comparative performance analysis of the two ORCs with working fluids: R134a and Propane, the simply recuperated S-CO2 cycle (RC) and recompressed-recuperated S-CO2 cycle (RRC) configurations is presented with varying number of preheaters. For all cases, ORC-R134a yields more power than the ORC-Propane, RC, and RRC configurations. In terms of the waste heat recovered, ORC-Propane marginally outperforms ORC-R134a. The ORC configurations recover 32%–38% of the available heat, while the S-CO2 configurations recover, at maximum, 25%–30% of the available heat.
大型余热发电工业余热回收系统的热力学分析
电力需求的加速增长要求在生产行业寻找潜在的废热回收解决方案。有效的废热回收的巨大潜力在水泥制造业被观察到。根据水泥厂的废热源温度,有两种潜在的选择,超临界CO2布雷顿循环(S-CO2)或有机朗肯循环(ORC),承诺低投资成本和提高热力学性能。目前的研究重点是模拟和优化S-CO2和ORC循环为1 MTPA水泥厂,生料熟料预热器作为废热源。主要目标是利用遗传算法使净功率输出最大化。对比分析了两种ORCs的工作流体:R134a和丙烷、简单回收S-CO2循环(RC)和再压缩-回收S-CO2循环(RRC)配置以及不同数量的预热器的性能。在所有情况下,ORC-R134a比orc -丙烷、RC和RRC配置产生更大的功率。在余热回收方面,orc -丙烷略微优于ORC-R134a。ORC配置可回收32%-38%的可用热量,而S-CO2配置最多可回收25%-30%的可用热量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信