{"title":"Cover's test of rationality revisited: Computability aspects of hypothesis testing","authors":"Amir Leshem","doi":"10.1109/EEEI.2006.321057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss computability aspects of hypothesis testing. We describe two main results. First we determine the type of sets that admit a weak decision procedure. Surprisingly some non-computable sets admit a computable weak decision procedure. This strengthens results of Cover and Putnam. We then apply the notion of weak decision procedure to the testing of the physical Church-Turing thesis. While our first theorem states that there are non-computable sets that admit weak decision procedures, we are able to show that no weak decision procedure can help us to decide that a physical device is capable of computing non Turing computable functions or that a physical constant encodes the bits of a non-computable real. This has strong implications on the validity of physical theories entailing the failure of the physical Church-Turing thesis.","PeriodicalId":142814,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEI.2006.321057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper we discuss computability aspects of hypothesis testing. We describe two main results. First we determine the type of sets that admit a weak decision procedure. Surprisingly some non-computable sets admit a computable weak decision procedure. This strengthens results of Cover and Putnam. We then apply the notion of weak decision procedure to the testing of the physical Church-Turing thesis. While our first theorem states that there are non-computable sets that admit weak decision procedures, we are able to show that no weak decision procedure can help us to decide that a physical device is capable of computing non Turing computable functions or that a physical constant encodes the bits of a non-computable real. This has strong implications on the validity of physical theories entailing the failure of the physical Church-Turing thesis.