The diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of MR neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haofeng Chen, Xinyue Huang, Yifang Bao, Chongbo Zhao, Jie Lin
{"title":"The diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of MR neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haofeng Chen, Xinyue Huang, Yifang Bao, Chongbo Zhao, Jie Lin","doi":"10.37766/inplasy2023.5.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We also compared various MRN parameters and determined the best performing one.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThrough literature searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid MEDLINE and ClinicalTtrials.gov until March 1, 2023, we selected studies with the diagnostic performance of MRN in CIDP patients. The pooled estimated sensitivity and specificity of quantitative MRN parameters were determined by a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the proper quantitative parameters and nerve sites.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 14 quantitative MRN studies with 23 results gave a pooled sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95%CI 0.86-0.92). Subgroup analysis of quantitative parameters showed the fractional anisotropy (FA) with the highest sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) and cross-sectional area (CSA) with the highest specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.85-0.99). The pooled correlation coefficient for interobserver agreements was 0.90 (95%CI 0.82-0.95).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nQuantitative MRN has considerable diagnostic value in CIDP patients with accuracy and reliability. FA and CSA can be promising parameters in the future diagnosis of CIDP patients.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nThis is the first meta-analysis of quantitative MRN in the diagnosis of CIDP.We have selected reliable parameters with cut-off value and providednew insights for subsequent diagnosis of CIDP.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.5.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We also compared various MRN parameters and determined the best performing one. METHODS Through literature searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid MEDLINE and ClinicalTtrials.gov until March 1, 2023, we selected studies with the diagnostic performance of MRN in CIDP patients. The pooled estimated sensitivity and specificity of quantitative MRN parameters were determined by a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the proper quantitative parameters and nerve sites. RESULTS A total of 14 quantitative MRN studies with 23 results gave a pooled sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95%CI 0.86-0.92). Subgroup analysis of quantitative parameters showed the fractional anisotropy (FA) with the highest sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) and cross-sectional area (CSA) with the highest specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.85-0.99). The pooled correlation coefficient for interobserver agreements was 0.90 (95%CI 0.82-0.95). CONCLUSION Quantitative MRN has considerable diagnostic value in CIDP patients with accuracy and reliability. FA and CSA can be promising parameters in the future diagnosis of CIDP patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first meta-analysis of quantitative MRN in the diagnosis of CIDP.We have selected reliable parameters with cut-off value and providednew insights for subsequent diagnosis of CIDP.
MR神经造影定量评估对慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变的诊断价值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的探讨定量磁共振神经造影(MRN)对慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变(CIDP)的诊断价值。我们还比较了各种MRN参数,并确定了表现最好的一个。方法通过PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Ovid MEDLINE和clinicaltrials .gov等截止到2023年3月1日的文献检索,选择MRN对CIDP患者有诊断作用的研究。定量MRN参数的综合估计灵敏度和特异性由双变量随机效应模型确定。进行亚组分析以评估合适的定量参数和神经部位。结果共14项定量MRN研究,23项结果,合并敏感性为0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79),合并特异性为0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92)。曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89 (95%CI 0.86 ~ 0.92)。定量参数亚组分析显示,分数各向异性(FA)的灵敏度最高为0.85 (95% CI 0.77 ~ 0.90),横截面积(CSA)的特异性最高为0.95 (95% CI 0.85 ~ 0.99)。观察者间一致性的合并相关系数为0.90 (95%CI 0.82-0.95)。结论定量MRN对CIDP患者的诊断具有较高的准确性和可靠性。FA和CSA可以作为未来诊断CIDP患者的有希望的参数。这是第一次对定量mri诊断CIDP的荟萃分析。我们选择了具有截止值的可靠参数,为CIDP的后续诊断提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信