Predicting Human Errors from Gaze and Cursor Movements

R. R. Saboundji, R. Rill
{"title":"Predicting Human Errors from Gaze and Cursor Movements","authors":"R. R. Saboundji, R. Rill","doi":"10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intelligent interfaces are increasingly integrated into diverse technological areas. In complex high-risk environments, where humans represent a crucial part of the system and their attention is often divided between simultaneous activities, imminent human errors may have serious consequences. Enhancing interfaces with predictive capabilities promotes the safe and reliable operation of such systems. In this work, we employ a data-driven approach to predict human errors in a special divided attention task involving timing constraints and requiring focused concentration and frequent shifts of attention. We performed a longitudinal study with 10 subjects, and constructed time series from the experimental data using gaze movement and mouse cursor motion features in order to classify successful and failed actions. We evaluate classical machine learning algorithms, compare them with a more traditional temporal modeling approach and a deep learning based LSTM model. Employing a leave-one- subject-out cross-validation procedure we achieve a classification accuracy of up to 86%, with LSTM presenting the highest performance. Furthermore, we investigate the trade-off between evaluation metrics and anticipation window, i.e. the time remaining until the correct action can still be performed. We conclude that prediction is feasible and accuracy and F1-score increases, despite the training dataset becoming greatly imbalanced. Investigating the anticipation window allows to understand how far in advance human errors need to be predicted in order to initiate preventive measures. Our efforts have implications for the design of predictive interfaces involving decision making under time pressure in dynamic divided attention environments.","PeriodicalId":134599,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Intelligent interfaces are increasingly integrated into diverse technological areas. In complex high-risk environments, where humans represent a crucial part of the system and their attention is often divided between simultaneous activities, imminent human errors may have serious consequences. Enhancing interfaces with predictive capabilities promotes the safe and reliable operation of such systems. In this work, we employ a data-driven approach to predict human errors in a special divided attention task involving timing constraints and requiring focused concentration and frequent shifts of attention. We performed a longitudinal study with 10 subjects, and constructed time series from the experimental data using gaze movement and mouse cursor motion features in order to classify successful and failed actions. We evaluate classical machine learning algorithms, compare them with a more traditional temporal modeling approach and a deep learning based LSTM model. Employing a leave-one- subject-out cross-validation procedure we achieve a classification accuracy of up to 86%, with LSTM presenting the highest performance. Furthermore, we investigate the trade-off between evaluation metrics and anticipation window, i.e. the time remaining until the correct action can still be performed. We conclude that prediction is feasible and accuracy and F1-score increases, despite the training dataset becoming greatly imbalanced. Investigating the anticipation window allows to understand how far in advance human errors need to be predicted in order to initiate preventive measures. Our efforts have implications for the design of predictive interfaces involving decision making under time pressure in dynamic divided attention environments.
从凝视和光标移动预测人类错误
智能接口越来越多地集成到不同的技术领域。在复杂的高风险环境中,人类是系统的关键组成部分,他们的注意力经常分散在同时进行的活动上,迫在眉睫的人为错误可能会产生严重的后果。增强具有预测能力的接口可促进此类系统的安全可靠运行。在这项工作中,我们采用数据驱动的方法来预测涉及时间限制、需要集中注意力和频繁转移注意力的特殊分散注意力任务中的人为错误。我们对10名受试者进行了纵向研究,并利用注视运动和鼠标光标运动特征从实验数据中构建时间序列,对成功和失败的动作进行分类。我们评估了经典的机器学习算法,将它们与更传统的时间建模方法和基于深度学习的LSTM模型进行了比较。采用留一个主体的交叉验证程序,我们实现了高达86%的分类准确率,其中LSTM表现出最高的性能。此外,我们还研究了评估指标和预期窗口之间的权衡,即直到仍然可以执行正确操作的剩余时间。我们得出结论,尽管训练数据集变得非常不平衡,但预测是可行的,准确性和f1分数都有所提高。调查预测窗口可以了解需要提前多远预测人为错误,以便启动预防措施。我们的研究对动态分散注意力环境下时间压力下决策的预测界面设计具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信