5. Recycling Patriarchy's Garbage: George Eliot's Pessimism and the Problem of a Site for Feminism

{"title":"5. Recycling Patriarchy's Garbage: George Eliot's Pessimism and the Problem of a Site for Feminism","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501723063-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theorists have long considered the way Western metaphysics has formed around metaphors of sight. Our notions of reality are informed by our understanding of what the visual means, es­ pecially by the assumption that the observation of empirical data somehow offers access to universal truth and natural law. So too literature and literary theory have always been intrigued by the relations be�een the linguistic and the visual . The conventions of literary realism rely on verbal imitations of such supposedly objec­ tive observation, proceeding as if a thousand words can actually equal a picture . Recent post-structural literary theory and criticism have investigated in particular this privileging of sight and the way language attempts to lay claim to it. One feminist approach, influ­ enced especially by Lacanian psychoanalysis, foregrounds the im­ portance of gender in its unraveling of the epistemological assump­ tions implied in questions of representation. By focusing on what critical shorthand terms \"the male gaze,\" these feminists have demonstrated how the scapegoating of women within the specular economy mars its transparency and brings its assumptions to our attention. 1 But more recent-Foucauldian-approaches to the stra-","PeriodicalId":162265,"journal":{"name":"Women and Romance","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Romance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723063-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theorists have long considered the way Western metaphysics has formed around metaphors of sight. Our notions of reality are informed by our understanding of what the visual means, es­ pecially by the assumption that the observation of empirical data somehow offers access to universal truth and natural law. So too literature and literary theory have always been intrigued by the relations be�een the linguistic and the visual . The conventions of literary realism rely on verbal imitations of such supposedly objec­ tive observation, proceeding as if a thousand words can actually equal a picture . Recent post-structural literary theory and criticism have investigated in particular this privileging of sight and the way language attempts to lay claim to it. One feminist approach, influ­ enced especially by Lacanian psychoanalysis, foregrounds the im­ portance of gender in its unraveling of the epistemological assump­ tions implied in questions of representation. By focusing on what critical shorthand terms "the male gaze," these feminists have demonstrated how the scapegoating of women within the specular economy mars its transparency and brings its assumptions to our attention. 1 But more recent-Foucauldian-approaches to the stra-
5. 回收父权制的垃圾:乔治·艾略特的悲观主义与女权主义的场地问题
理论家们长期以来一直在考虑西方形而上学是如何围绕视觉隐喻形成的。我们对现实的概念是通过我们对视觉意义的理解而形成的,特别是通过对经验数据的观察以某种方式提供了通往普遍真理和自然法则的途径这一假设。文学和文学理论也一直被语言和视觉之间的关系所吸引。文学现实主义的惯例依赖于对这种所谓客观观察的口头模仿,就好像千言万语实际上相当于一幅画一样。最近的后结构文学理论和批评特别研究了这种视觉特权,以及语言试图占有这种特权的方式。一种女权主义的研究方法,尤其受到拉康精神分析的影响,强调性别在揭示表征问题中隐含的认识论假设中的重要性。这些女权主义者把重点放在批判性的“男性凝视”上,展示了女性在镜面经济中充当替罪羊是如何破坏其透明度的,并让我们注意到它的假设。但最近——福柯式的——研究stra的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信