The Politics of the Science Wars

Science Wars Pub Date : 1996-01-21 DOI:10.2307/466853
S. Aronowitz
{"title":"The Politics of the Science Wars","authors":"S. Aronowitz","doi":"10.2307/466853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"reason versus unreason. While the language and vocabularies of science are different from those of the arts, the animus is the same: as for those safeguarding culture and science, the barbarians are at the gates. Those who would demystify science by showing it is subject to the same cultural and social influences as any other discourse, no less than critics who excoriate science for remaining silent when its discoveries are recruited for nefarious purposes, are charged with being prophets of (take your pick) unreason, mysticism, anti-Enlightenment, and nihilism, and with being promulgators of a higher superstition. Science controversies are by no means as esoteric as one would think. Consider the bizarre result of an FBI investigation into the identity of the notorious Unabomber who, according to the New York Times, has, in the last seventeen years, \"killed three people and injured 23 others\" (Broad 1995). An agent appeared at the New Orleans meetings of the History of Science Association in October 1994 and subpoenaed its membership records because the FBI suspected the \"bomber is immersed in the most radical interpretations of the history of science.\" According to the Times report, \"professors have begun reconsidering old suspicions, acquaintances and tracts to help solve the crimes.\" Except for Langdon Winner of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, most of the association members and officials the reporter interviewed were donning their detective hats and Sherlock Holmes pipes or were prone to dismiss the bomber as \"marginal\" in professional science studies. Winner joked he was disappointed the FBI did not consult him on the case. \"I feel left out. It's like being left off the guest list for a really good party\" (Broad 1995). Defenders of science such as Paul Gross and Norman Levitt (1994) write polemics that betray philosophical naivete; others, like the New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS), are hosting conferences and symposia in which the critical theory of science is represented as a virus that must be","PeriodicalId":114432,"journal":{"name":"Science Wars","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/466853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

reason versus unreason. While the language and vocabularies of science are different from those of the arts, the animus is the same: as for those safeguarding culture and science, the barbarians are at the gates. Those who would demystify science by showing it is subject to the same cultural and social influences as any other discourse, no less than critics who excoriate science for remaining silent when its discoveries are recruited for nefarious purposes, are charged with being prophets of (take your pick) unreason, mysticism, anti-Enlightenment, and nihilism, and with being promulgators of a higher superstition. Science controversies are by no means as esoteric as one would think. Consider the bizarre result of an FBI investigation into the identity of the notorious Unabomber who, according to the New York Times, has, in the last seventeen years, "killed three people and injured 23 others" (Broad 1995). An agent appeared at the New Orleans meetings of the History of Science Association in October 1994 and subpoenaed its membership records because the FBI suspected the "bomber is immersed in the most radical interpretations of the history of science." According to the Times report, "professors have begun reconsidering old suspicions, acquaintances and tracts to help solve the crimes." Except for Langdon Winner of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, most of the association members and officials the reporter interviewed were donning their detective hats and Sherlock Holmes pipes or were prone to dismiss the bomber as "marginal" in professional science studies. Winner joked he was disappointed the FBI did not consult him on the case. "I feel left out. It's like being left off the guest list for a really good party" (Broad 1995). Defenders of science such as Paul Gross and Norman Levitt (1994) write polemics that betray philosophical naivete; others, like the New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS), are hosting conferences and symposia in which the critical theory of science is represented as a virus that must be
科学战争的政治
理性vs非理性。虽然科学的语言和词汇不同于艺术,但敌意是相同的:对于那些保护文化和科学的人来说,野蛮人就在门口。那些通过表明科学和其他话语一样受到同样的文化和社会影响而去神秘化科学的人,就像那些在科学发现被用于邪恶目的时谴责科学保持沉默的批评家一样,被指控为(随你挑)非理性、神秘主义、反启蒙运动和虚无主义的先知,被指控为更高迷信的传播者。科学争议绝不像人们想象的那么深奥。想想联邦调查局对臭名昭著的炸弹客的身份进行调查的奇异结果吧,据《纽约时报》报道,在过去的17年里,他“杀死了3人,打伤了23人”(Broad 1995)。1994年10月,一名特工出现在科学史协会的新奥尔良会议上,并传唤了该协会的会员记录,因为联邦调查局怀疑“炸弹袭击者沉浸在对科学史最激进的解释中”。据《纽约时报》报道,“教授们已经开始重新考虑以前的怀疑、熟人和传单,以帮助破案。”除了伦斯勒理工学院(Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)的兰登·温纳(Langdon Winner)之外,记者采访的大多数协会成员和官员都戴着侦探帽,叼着福尔摩斯式的烟斗,或者倾向于将炸弹袭击者视为专业科学研究中的“边缘人物”。温纳开玩笑说,他对联邦调查局没有就此案征求他的意见感到失望。“我觉得被冷落了。这就像在一个非常好的派对上被排除在客人名单之外”(Broad 1995)。保罗·格罗斯(Paul Gross)和诺曼·莱维特(Norman Levitt)(1994)等科学捍卫者撰写的论战暴露了哲学上的天真;其他机构,如纽约科学院(NYAS),正在举办会议和专题讨论会,在这些会议和专题讨论会中,科学批判理论被描绘成一种必须存在的病毒
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信