The Effects of Playful Physical Contact as an Establishing Operation on Correct Academic Responding of Three Preschool Students.

Hyesu Park, Jo Ann Pereira Delgado, Jinhyeok Choi, R. D. Greer
{"title":"The Effects of Playful Physical Contact as an Establishing Operation on Correct Academic Responding of Three Preschool Students.","authors":"Hyesu Park, Jo Ann Pereira Delgado, Jinhyeok Choi, R. D. Greer","doi":"10.1037/H0100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivating individuals with developmental disabilities can be challenging to educators (Egel, 1981, Greer, 2002). In an effort to motivate them, the effects of variation of reinforcer stimuli on correct responding and on-task behavior of individuals with disabilities have been tested (Egel, 1981) and those of variation of antecedent stimuli during discrimination tasks have been evaluated (Dunlap & Koegel, 1980). The influence of antecedent and consequent variables on problematic behaviors were also tested (Carr, Yarbrough, & Langdon, (1997); Mace & Lalli, 1991); and Repp, Felce, & Barton, 1988) in relation to the motivational variables. The results of these studies demonstrated that arrangement of antecedent stimuli or consequent stimuli affected behaviors of individuals with developmental disabilities. However, there were other variables in addition to the core components of the three-term contingencies that affected behaviors of individuals with disabilities (Berg, Peck, Wacker, Harding, McComas, Richman, & Brown, 2000). Several studies identified instructional history as one of variables that affect children's acquisition of verbal operants (Greer, Nirgudkar, & Park, 2003; Greer, Stolfi, Chavez-Brown, & Rivera-Valdez, 2005; Lee Park, 2005). For example, in Greer et al.'s study (2005), young children with developmental disabilities who did not exhibit Naming prior to the study acquired Naming as a higher order operant after they had instructional history of Naming through multiple exemplar instruction. Another variable that affects acquisition of new operants is establishing operations (EOs). William and Greer (1993) created EOs by placing children under deprivation for specific items in order to create a motivational context, which is necessary in the acquisition of a verbal operant: the mand. Other studies also demonstrated EOs as necessary components of children's learning of new verbal operants (Hall & Sundberg, 1987; Ross, Nuzzolo, Stolfi, Natarelli, & Greer, 2006; Reilly-Lawson & Greer, 2006). As we mentioned above, the three-term contingencies were affected by establishing operations (EOs) as the contexts of the contingencies that preceded the antecedent stimuli (Greer, 2002). EOs as motivational events alter the value of reinforcers that follow responses and thus affect the probability of the responses (Greer, 2002; Greer & Ross, 2008; Michael, 1982). For example, after parents arrange deprivation of playing a computer game by not allowing a child to play the game for a period of time, the child is more likely to finish his/her homework in order to gain the assess to the computer game. In this case, deprivation of playing the computer game is establishing operation and this increases the reinforcement effects of the games and the probability of finishing his/her homework. In O'Reilly's (1999) study, four analogue analysis conditions (i.e., attention, demand, leisure, and play) were randomly conducted in order to test the effects of pre-session attention on the occurrence of attention-maintained yelling and head hitting. Levels of attention (no attention versus high attention) were manipulated prior to the analogue analysis condition to test the influence of pre-session attention on the problem behavior during the attention analogue condition. The results showed that higher levels of yelling and head hitting occurred when the participant was deprived of attention prior to the attention analogue condition. McComas, Thompson, and Johnson (2003) tested the effects of pre-session attention on the subsequent occurrences of problem behavior with elementary school students with disabilities. In their study, variation of continuous attention conditions was followed by ignoring conditions on attention-maintained or escape-maintained problem behaviors. The results showed that the pre-session exposure to attention decreased attention-maintained problem behaviors, whereas it did not affect escape-maintained problem behaviors. …","PeriodicalId":236920,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Early and Intensive Behavioral Intervention","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Early and Intensive Behavioral Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Motivating individuals with developmental disabilities can be challenging to educators (Egel, 1981, Greer, 2002). In an effort to motivate them, the effects of variation of reinforcer stimuli on correct responding and on-task behavior of individuals with disabilities have been tested (Egel, 1981) and those of variation of antecedent stimuli during discrimination tasks have been evaluated (Dunlap & Koegel, 1980). The influence of antecedent and consequent variables on problematic behaviors were also tested (Carr, Yarbrough, & Langdon, (1997); Mace & Lalli, 1991); and Repp, Felce, & Barton, 1988) in relation to the motivational variables. The results of these studies demonstrated that arrangement of antecedent stimuli or consequent stimuli affected behaviors of individuals with developmental disabilities. However, there were other variables in addition to the core components of the three-term contingencies that affected behaviors of individuals with disabilities (Berg, Peck, Wacker, Harding, McComas, Richman, & Brown, 2000). Several studies identified instructional history as one of variables that affect children's acquisition of verbal operants (Greer, Nirgudkar, & Park, 2003; Greer, Stolfi, Chavez-Brown, & Rivera-Valdez, 2005; Lee Park, 2005). For example, in Greer et al.'s study (2005), young children with developmental disabilities who did not exhibit Naming prior to the study acquired Naming as a higher order operant after they had instructional history of Naming through multiple exemplar instruction. Another variable that affects acquisition of new operants is establishing operations (EOs). William and Greer (1993) created EOs by placing children under deprivation for specific items in order to create a motivational context, which is necessary in the acquisition of a verbal operant: the mand. Other studies also demonstrated EOs as necessary components of children's learning of new verbal operants (Hall & Sundberg, 1987; Ross, Nuzzolo, Stolfi, Natarelli, & Greer, 2006; Reilly-Lawson & Greer, 2006). As we mentioned above, the three-term contingencies were affected by establishing operations (EOs) as the contexts of the contingencies that preceded the antecedent stimuli (Greer, 2002). EOs as motivational events alter the value of reinforcers that follow responses and thus affect the probability of the responses (Greer, 2002; Greer & Ross, 2008; Michael, 1982). For example, after parents arrange deprivation of playing a computer game by not allowing a child to play the game for a period of time, the child is more likely to finish his/her homework in order to gain the assess to the computer game. In this case, deprivation of playing the computer game is establishing operation and this increases the reinforcement effects of the games and the probability of finishing his/her homework. In O'Reilly's (1999) study, four analogue analysis conditions (i.e., attention, demand, leisure, and play) were randomly conducted in order to test the effects of pre-session attention on the occurrence of attention-maintained yelling and head hitting. Levels of attention (no attention versus high attention) were manipulated prior to the analogue analysis condition to test the influence of pre-session attention on the problem behavior during the attention analogue condition. The results showed that higher levels of yelling and head hitting occurred when the participant was deprived of attention prior to the attention analogue condition. McComas, Thompson, and Johnson (2003) tested the effects of pre-session attention on the subsequent occurrences of problem behavior with elementary school students with disabilities. In their study, variation of continuous attention conditions was followed by ignoring conditions on attention-maintained or escape-maintained problem behaviors. The results showed that the pre-session exposure to attention decreased attention-maintained problem behaviors, whereas it did not affect escape-maintained problem behaviors. …
游戏性身体接触作为建立操作对三名学龄前儿童正确学业反应的影响。
激励有发育障碍的个体对教育者来说是一个挑战(Egel, 1981, Greer, 2002)。为了激励他们,我们测试了强化刺激的变化对残疾个体正确反应和任务行为的影响(Egel, 1981),并评估了歧视任务中前因刺激的变化(Dunlap & Koegel, 1980)。也测试了前因变量和后因变量对问题行为的影响(Carr, Yarbrough, & Langdon, (1997);Mace & Lalli, 1991);Repp, Felce, & Barton, 1988)与动机变量的关系。这些研究结果表明,前刺激或后刺激的安排对发育障碍个体的行为有影响。然而,除了影响残疾个体行为的三项随变的核心成分之外,还有其他变量(Berg, Peck, Wacker, Harding, McComas, Richman, & Brown, 2000)。一些研究认为教学历史是影响儿童语言操作习得的变量之一(Greer, Nirgudkar, & Park, 2003;Greer, Stolfi, Chavez-Brown, & Rivera-Valdez, 2005;李·朴,2005)。例如,在Greer等人的研究(2005)中,在研究之前没有表现出命名能力的发育性残疾幼儿在通过多范例教学获得命名能力的教学历史后,获得了更高阶的命名能力。另一个影响获得新操作员的变量是建立业务(EOs)。William和Greer(1993)通过将儿童置于特定项目的剥夺状态来创造动机情境,这是获得言语操作符(命令)所必需的。其他研究也表明,情感表达是儿童学习新言语操作符的必要组成部分(Hall & Sundberg, 1987;Ross, Nuzzolo, Stolfi, Natarelli, & Greer, 2006;Reilly-Lawson & Greer, 2006)。如上所述,将操作(EOs)作为先于前事刺激的偶然性的背景,会影响三个术语的偶然性(Greer, 2002)。情绪作为动机事件改变了反应后强化物的价值,从而影响了反应的概率(Greer, 2002;Greer & Ross, 2008;迈克尔,1982)。例如,父母在一段时间内不让孩子玩电脑游戏,从而剥夺孩子玩电脑游戏的权利后,孩子更有可能完成家庭作业,以获得对电脑游戏的评估。在这种情况下,剥夺玩电脑游戏是建立操作,这增加了游戏的强化效应和完成作业的概率。O’reilly(1999)的研究随机设置了注意、需求、休闲、玩耍四种模拟分析条件,以检验会前注意对维持注意的吼叫和撞头行为发生的影响。在模拟分析条件之前操纵注意水平(无注意和高注意),以测试在注意模拟条件下,会前注意对问题行为的影响。结果表明,当参与者在注意力模拟条件之前被剥夺注意力时,大喊大叫和撞头的水平更高。McComas, Thompson, and Johnson(2003)测试了会前注意对残疾小学生后续问题行为发生的影响。在他们的研究中,持续注意条件的变化之后,忽略了注意维持或逃避维持问题行为的条件。结果表明,课前注意暴露减少了注意维持问题行为,而对逃避维持问题行为没有影响。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信