{"title":"Voicing the Silence of the Stigmatised: Communication with the Landscape in Selected Poems of Thomas Hardy and Gerard Manley Hopkins","authors":"Eric Ngea Ntam","doi":"10.56907/goplkusr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most human beings continue to erroneously claim speech and communication as exclusive attributes of the supposed superior human race, presumably due to humanity’s adherence to the dominant anthropocentric teachings of the Great Chain of Being. The voices or articulations of other living beings such as animals, birds, insects and the flora (trees and grass), here considered as the stigmatised are ignored or simply rendered inexistent by humans. This paper investigates he communicative abilities of landscape beings as delineated in selected poems of Thomas Hardy and Gerard Manley Hopkins. It adopts the ecocritical views of Cheryll Glotfelty, Christopher Manes and Michael J. McDowell to argue that the notion speech and communication is not limited to humans. The paper stresses that non-human beings are endowed with the ability to communicate and that it is possible for humans to learn the language of other beings for mutual communication. It further stresses that an understanding of the speech and communication potentials of the non-human neighbours of humankind would trigger a reconsideration of the ‘inferior’ position human beings have ascribed to other creatures. The paper emphasises that keen observation of the behaviour, facial expressions and postures of non-humans would facilitate the understanding of their language and communication. It equally sees Manes’ and McDowell’s ecocritical discourses as suitable perspectives to be adopt in order to fill the existing communication gap between humans and other landscape beings. The paper concludes that mutual communication between landscape beings would curb the indifference, negligence and, above all, the cruelty the supposed stigmatised ‘inferior’ non-human beings endure from human beings.","PeriodicalId":362245,"journal":{"name":"CLAREP Journal of English and Linguistics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLAREP Journal of English and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56907/goplkusr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most human beings continue to erroneously claim speech and communication as exclusive attributes of the supposed superior human race, presumably due to humanity’s adherence to the dominant anthropocentric teachings of the Great Chain of Being. The voices or articulations of other living beings such as animals, birds, insects and the flora (trees and grass), here considered as the stigmatised are ignored or simply rendered inexistent by humans. This paper investigates he communicative abilities of landscape beings as delineated in selected poems of Thomas Hardy and Gerard Manley Hopkins. It adopts the ecocritical views of Cheryll Glotfelty, Christopher Manes and Michael J. McDowell to argue that the notion speech and communication is not limited to humans. The paper stresses that non-human beings are endowed with the ability to communicate and that it is possible for humans to learn the language of other beings for mutual communication. It further stresses that an understanding of the speech and communication potentials of the non-human neighbours of humankind would trigger a reconsideration of the ‘inferior’ position human beings have ascribed to other creatures. The paper emphasises that keen observation of the behaviour, facial expressions and postures of non-humans would facilitate the understanding of their language and communication. It equally sees Manes’ and McDowell’s ecocritical discourses as suitable perspectives to be adopt in order to fill the existing communication gap between humans and other landscape beings. The paper concludes that mutual communication between landscape beings would curb the indifference, negligence and, above all, the cruelty the supposed stigmatised ‘inferior’ non-human beings endure from human beings.
大多数人继续错误地声称语言和交流是所谓的高级人类的独有属性,大概是因为人类坚持以人类中心主义为主导的“存在之链”教义。其他生物的声音或发音,如动物、鸟类、昆虫和植物(树和草),在这里被认为是被污名化的,被人类忽视或干脆不存在。本文考察了托马斯·哈代和杰拉德·曼利·霍普金斯诗歌选集中所描绘的山水生物的交际能力。它采用了cheryl Glotfelty, Christopher Manes和Michael J. McDowell的生态批评观点,认为语言和交流的概念并不局限于人类。本文强调非人类具有交流的能力,人类有可能学习其他生物的语言进行相互交流。它进一步强调,对人类非人类邻居的语言和交流潜力的理解将引发对人类归因于其他生物的“劣等”地位的重新思考。这篇论文强调,对非人类的行为、面部表情和姿势的敏锐观察将有助于理解他们的语言和交流。它同样认为,为了填补人类与其他景观生物之间现有的沟通差距,可以采用Manes和McDowell的生态批评话语作为合适的视角。本文的结论是,景观生物之间的相互交流将抑制冷漠、忽视,尤其是被认为是耻辱的“劣等”非人类忍受人类的残忍。