The Genus Maiestaticum in Non-Brenzian Christologies

R. Cross
{"title":"The Genus Maiestaticum in Non-Brenzian Christologies","authors":"R. Cross","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198846970.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the views of three Lutheran theologians, writing in the late 1560s, who accept the genus maiestaticum without any of Brenz’s distinctive Christological metaphysics: namely, Jacob Schegk, Joachim Wigand, and Martin Chemnitz in the first edition of his De duabus naturis in Christo. The difference between these thinkers is described, as is the complex influence of Melanchthon, Brenz, and Andreae on their various Christological positions. The chapter shows how the theologians reacted to the divergence between Brenz and Andreae on the character of the human nature’s possession of divine attributes","PeriodicalId":360748,"journal":{"name":"Communicatio Idiomatum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicatio Idiomatum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846970.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes the views of three Lutheran theologians, writing in the late 1560s, who accept the genus maiestaticum without any of Brenz’s distinctive Christological metaphysics: namely, Jacob Schegk, Joachim Wigand, and Martin Chemnitz in the first edition of his De duabus naturis in Christo. The difference between these thinkers is described, as is the complex influence of Melanchthon, Brenz, and Andreae on their various Christological positions. The chapter shows how the theologians reacted to the divergence between Brenz and Andreae on the character of the human nature’s possession of divine attributes
非布伦齐亚基督论中的马氏属
这一章描述了三位路德神学家的观点,他们写于1560年代末,他们接受了没有任何布伦茨独特的基督形而上学的主属,即雅各布·谢克,约阿希姆·维冈和马丁·开姆尼茨在他的《基督中的自然》第一版中的观点。本文描述了这些思想家之间的差异,以及梅兰希顿、布伦茨和安德烈对他们不同基督论立场的复杂影响。这一章展示了神学家是如何对布伦茨和安德烈之间关于人性拥有神圣属性的分歧作出反应的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信