Chapter 14 “I really don’t have a career. I just work and I like doing my work.” A Qualitative Study on the Meaning of Work for Low-income Women from a Family Perspective

Sarah A. Burcher, Kadie L. Ausherbauer
{"title":"Chapter 14 “I really don’t have a career. I just work and I like doing my work.” A Qualitative Study on the Meaning of Work for Low-income Women from a Family Perspective","authors":"Sarah A. Burcher, Kadie L. Ausherbauer","doi":"10.1108/S1530-353520180000013016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe purpose of this study was to explore low-income women’s perspectives of the shared meaning of work and employment values in their intergenerational family context from a critical and systemic lens. Participants were rural and urban women from low-income contexts (N = 14). Semi-structured interviews were designed to elicit thick description of lived experiences of work and family. Analyses were conducted using Van Manen’s hermeneutic phenomenology coding process (1990). \n \nFour emergent categories (Purpose to Work, What Work Is, Motherhood and Work, and Loss, Resilience and Work) with 16 themes described work–family integration. These narratives evoked a deep interconnectedness of work, family, and life. Because participants were recruited in locations where they were either already employed or seeking employment, these findings may not represent other women. \n \nEffectiveness of programs and policies could be expanded by incorporating women’s values and motivations for employment and targeting family-level interventions. Programs could better empower women to seek employment and skills training for lasting financial sustainability, rather than just getting any job. Because participants distinguished between careers and jobs based on college education, many felt they could never obtain a career. Additionally, participants described work–family integration, not the prevalent idea of “work–life balance.” Participants described fighting to provide a better life for their children. \n \nThis study highlights under-represented perspectives of low-income women about work. Understanding the experiences of low-income women is essential for designing programs and services that will be practical and useful.","PeriodicalId":217936,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","volume":"47 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520180000013016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore low-income women’s perspectives of the shared meaning of work and employment values in their intergenerational family context from a critical and systemic lens. Participants were rural and urban women from low-income contexts (N = 14). Semi-structured interviews were designed to elicit thick description of lived experiences of work and family. Analyses were conducted using Van Manen’s hermeneutic phenomenology coding process (1990). Four emergent categories (Purpose to Work, What Work Is, Motherhood and Work, and Loss, Resilience and Work) with 16 themes described work–family integration. These narratives evoked a deep interconnectedness of work, family, and life. Because participants were recruited in locations where they were either already employed or seeking employment, these findings may not represent other women. Effectiveness of programs and policies could be expanded by incorporating women’s values and motivations for employment and targeting family-level interventions. Programs could better empower women to seek employment and skills training for lasting financial sustainability, rather than just getting any job. Because participants distinguished between careers and jobs based on college education, many felt they could never obtain a career. Additionally, participants described work–family integration, not the prevalent idea of “work–life balance.” Participants described fighting to provide a better life for their children. This study highlights under-represented perspectives of low-income women about work. Understanding the experiences of low-income women is essential for designing programs and services that will be practical and useful.
第14章“我真的没有事业。我只是工作,我喜欢做我的工作。”家庭视角下低收入妇女工作意义的质性研究
摘要本研究旨在从批判性和系统性的角度探讨低收入妇女在代际家庭背景下对工作和就业价值的共同意义的看法。参与者为来自低收入家庭的农村和城市妇女(N = 14)。半结构化的访谈旨在引出对工作和家庭生活经历的详细描述。使用Van Manen的解释学现象学编码过程(1990)进行分析。四个新兴类别(工作的目的、工作是什么、母性和工作、损失、恢复力和工作)共16个主题描述了工作与家庭的融合。这些叙述唤起了工作、家庭和生活之间深刻的相互联系。由于参与者是在她们已经就业或正在求职的地方被招募的,因此这些调查结果可能不能代表其他妇女。可以通过纳入妇女的价值观和就业动机以及针对家庭层面的干预措施来扩大方案和政策的有效性。这些项目可以更好地赋予妇女权力,使她们能够寻求就业和技能培训,以实现持久的财务可持续性,而不仅仅是找到一份工作。因为参与者区分了基于大学教育的职业和工作,许多人觉得他们永远也找不到工作。此外,参与者描述了工作与家庭的融合,而不是流行的“工作与生活的平衡”。与会者描述了为子女提供更好生活的奋斗。这项研究突出了低收入妇女对工作的看法。了解低收入妇女的经历对于设计实用和有用的项目和服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信